It is very close, but obviously i would be bias towards Morrison lmao.

One is a youthful Brit at the pinnacle of his career, the other is an ageing overseas quota player with his best years behind him

Easy choice.

Yes Morrison i just can't understand what all the hype is about Ellis godd defender but offers nothing attacking wise that's my oppion of him any way.

Thats crazy redone.

Ellis is far better than Morrison.

Asim, Ellis isn't fit to lace Morrison's boots, and you know it.

Asim?

LMAO

With comments like the above its plainly obvious to see that you regularly engage in heavy binges of inhaling crack cocaine into the lungs.

Be rid of such toxins and clear your mind of such silly thoughts.




Jesus Christ, that is hillarious











Try not to embarras yourself any futher tonight wont you?
Next you'll be claiming that Michael Platt is better than Paul Wellens and Brent Webb.

But he is. =white[size=200 joke[/size

Get real Red, In what department?

I expect more sense from you.

When do you see Wellens or Webb giving the ball up in three consecuctive games that lead to points. He's scored one try in almost a year.

You dont think Platt is world class do you?

7 wins in 18 games is a worrying trend.

I know it's not always fair to overlap seasons results.

But it still must be a concern. 18 games is too long a period to be considered a bad patch IMO. 18 games is pretty much 2/3 of a season 7 wins isn't even top 6 form.

Platt started off excellently last season, but has gone down. Is the poster who said he hasn't scored in nearly a year correct?

That's strange considering bulls try to play a more open game and platt is pacey.

Bradford made a promising start under Mcnamara, but it seems to have gradually got worse. But then, it's a bit of an enigma because when you think abuot it the bulls didn't do too badly last season, unlucky not to get top 2 cc semi and a brain fart in the playoffs.

Yep, he has scored 1 try since Millenium Magic last season.

Suppose he is going through a bad patch as well then?

Examine the quote a bit better then come back.

Thats all it is, I could take it as sarcasm, but I reckon you were being serious.

What else is there to examine?

It was on all the time i put the remark because i knew you would respond in the way you did.

You do think Platt is better than the previously mentione Webb and Wellens though dont you?

No i don't i just don't think he's as bad as you make out.

better than brent webb? new zealand international?

and wellens gb international?

wonder how many caps platt has, all serious now just ask any coach who they would rather have

hence why platt hardly plays for his country

knowing we have platt as our 'first choice' full back is pretty embarasing specially when full backs from teams who are average have better Fullbacks than platt

And your solution, within the salary cap, is...?

Play Paul Sykes there.

well i don't know how much we are already below the salary cap because we have lost players since last year and bought average ones,

to be honest i would of prefered to buy 3 decent players than 5 average and if we get rid of players like harris, tupou, and other players who arn't good enough we would have enough money to strengthan the other area's tht are week

harris and tupou will be costing us alot of money in the salary cap and they are hardly playing this year so why keep them?

The general understanding is that we are spending to the salary cap. Therefore there is no capacity available until a player leaves.

You cannot get rid of a player without paying his contract up in compensation. And that counts as salary cap expenditure.

People maybe keep forgetting...our salary cap has effectively been significantly reduced, because that part of Harris' package previously off-cap is now on-cap - as the little matter of the 2005 and 2006 breaches "clarified".

I suspect you would not GET "three decent players" (if by that you mean decent internationals and/or British) for the cost of "five average ones". My guess is that some of our recruits ae on very much less than many people realise. Bet you'd struggle to get TWO for the same money, and given we were down to last 17 fit (and some will have been far from that) players on Thursday, would we have been happier with only 14 fit? Or 16 if the two out on loan were back? Which part-time plasterer would we have called up this time?

Not decrying the arguments - far from it - just trying to clarify a few points especially for those who think the solution is "sign better players".

For once, your argument is irrefutable. Although we both know the guy was suggesting a replacement new player as opposed to just a change-round. Sykes may anyway be required in the centres if/when Hape goes.

You never did explain to people just what Platt did to you/your girlfriend/your boyfriend/your pet hamster that caused you to feel the need to wage a vendetta against him on here?

i understand what your trying to say just the side as a whole are playing pathetic with a few exceptions but we need to do something or else we may not get into the top six and i feel that with most bulls fans they see teams like warrington signing quality players and leeds signing world class like buderus whilst we sign average players, just don't feel it's good enough for a team who can be considered as one of the best in superleague

something really needs to change or we will become an average side and as a bulls fan i and many others don't want to see that and we can't really go much worse than we already are because not winning is already below standard for us

maybe people should lower expectations? and just settle for there team as average despite the great success in the past decade

He did nothing, I just dont like his attitude on the field whilst wearing a Bulls shirt. I dont like the fact that all he has done is score a few tries and being hailed as a world beater when its plainly obvious he's rubbish. I dont like the fact that Bradford waste their money on a poor player.

I think we may have a bit more scope for marquee signings once Harris is off the cap for good. And as for how some other clubs might have managed it under the cap...well I'm sure the likes of Florida Bull can fill you in, or I could maybe let you know in a brown paper envelope. But anyway...are we really into paying megabucks to players who want to retire from the NRL and come here to earn their pension - displacing a good GB player in so doing? Seemed a strange decision, that one.

But as for settling for "average" - no chance! Any sporting organisation which settles for average has given up competing. And any fan who does so is aiding and abetting. And anyway, "average" can become "exceptional" if you can get the best out of people. If it ever looks like the club is "settling for average" that will be the time to take up tiddlywinks.

yes i understand i hope harris packs his bags soon we really do need to sign new players with class whether from superleague or nrl! just aslong as we begin to perform and begin to win, or tbh i would much prefer if players we already have begin to perform because some of them really need to take there finger out there bum!

and te bulls may not be settling for average as such but thats what it seems like theres no passion or effort in the games and the backroom staff must have realised there is a problem since we have lost more than won this year and they arn't doing anything about it, but like you say i hope that 'average' can become 'exceptional' just from this seasons performances what i have seen i cannot see where we are going to start ?

not much to work with , like you said with salary cap ... injuries and just overall class within the squad