No, I think he's due in court in April over it, which is why signing him now might be a bad idea.

Yeah, the dodgy ink thing is probably why Hull have got shut

From a playing point of view only, I would welcome his addition.
If the club are confident of the "other stuff" not being an issue, then I'd hope we'd certainly think about it

I would have thought if there was a confidence about that though, Hull wouldn't have gotten rid. They obviously seem to think he's in bother.

I completely agree with you though. If it was a purely playing point of view, he would improve our team. Unfortunately, it's not.

thing is if he gets cleared in april then he'll be able to demand a higher wage. might be worth getting him now on a cheaper 1 year deal and write it into contract that if found guilty contract is void. We get an extra option on wing for a few months for little money and no strings attached.

Well yeah, as a player he'd be an improvement on what we have, but his current baggage (i'm not saying it was all her fault mind

) does cause a 2nd thoughts

Always rated Raynor so I think he is worth a look, excellent cover if nothing else.

Whats the score with the Ink Cartridges

We'll talking Leroy Rivett, the way its going

Better than Sheriffe.



Ok, maybe that's taking it a bit too far.....

Take a look [url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/dec/18/gareth-raynor-hull-fcHERE[/url

I don't rate him much better than Sheriffe to be honest. Well past his best and would come with significant baggage also it would seem.

Not a player I`ve ever really rated that highly. Don`t think he played much last year did he? Maybe that`

Not a player I`ve ever really rated [ithat[/i highly. Don`t think he played much last year did he? Maybe that`s why he`s on his way?

He's on his way because of the court case, I don't think there's much doubting that.

He played in 14 matches for Hull last year, but I think the only reason he didn't play in the others was injury.

The injury bit was really the main reason why I wouldn`t be too interested. I think Morro played in more than that (?) and that`s why (allegedly) he left the Bulls.

raynor ex gb international, sheriffe?????

if raynor didn't have any off field problems or injuries he would walk into most starting line ups. it is his off field issues why we have let him go

Yes -I think he could do a job for us. Pretty decent winger and IMO a little better than Sheriffe.
Yes - Injury was a problem last year but not I hear a repetative one.
No- Don't know the extent of his involvement in alleged criminal proceedings and his risk of a custodial sentance.
Yes- we could probably sign him reasonably cheap with provisos on his fitness and availability.
No- I dont think we will sign him. He adds little to the squad.

Except it's nearly 2010... not 2005. We could do with a centre too, but I don't think we should offer Gary Connolly a contract either.

I'd be quite peeved if Bradford signed Raynor, too much baggage and bound to have an unsettling influence at a time when all seems rather positive. Needed like a second ar$ehole IMO.

There was also [url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2008/jul/28/hullfcrl.superleaguethis[/url.

I would rather have Sheriffe, he's not the best player but he has protential, doesnt have baggage, not injury prone and still young.

Sheriffe wasn't half bad at London and if he can regain some form and sort himself out defensively then he isn't too bad.

He's not good enough never will be.

I think you know thats a bit harsh. He's never going to be word class, granted, but I think he can be decent enough (Leeds home) but that needs to be consistent, and lets face it, he won't be on a massive contract either.

I agree with RER on this, Sheriffe is never going to be good enough for a top team. I really don't see this "potential" that people keep saying he's got.

Every team has to have the odd average player though in order to pay the top ones a decent wage.

I thought in law people were innocent until proved guilty ?