No.

So what is the accurate figure?

No one knows because the only person with access to the financial information at the club was Andrew Chalmers.

As part of the process for being in special measures, the RFL made him and the club employ an independent accountant but within two weeks the move to Dewsbury was announced and she was made redundant.

So how do you know its not accurate if no one knows

so how can make an assumption when you have no figures to work on, I personally think its a massive figure to run a club from but I wouldn't make a comment on it as I have nothing in front of me to assume who's right
its no wonder your finding disgruntled fans having ago at you when your using your media to vent your frustrations, its ok having an opinion but have you thought about allowing the progress to be made with you pushing your opinion on it.

I do hope these forum meetings that are being held are allowed to talk as I remember ours at the time being disruptive at the time

No opinion, just facts. Andrew Chalmers self audited the accounts.

You're dodging the question.

What is the question?

You're doing it again.

So tonight we have Mick Gledhill saying only Andrew Chalmers knows the financial information at the Bulls.
We then have Snowie, quite rightly, saying so how can you comment and make assumptions without knowing all the facts and figures.
Then we have Mick Gledhill saying it’s facts not opinions, even though he’s already said only Andrew Chalmers knows the financial information at the Bulls.

I think I rest my case.

Come back nestegg, oh hang on a minute you already have.

Doing what again? If you want me to answer something then ask me a question? It's not hard is it?

This is why I very rarely frequent this place anymore.

More fool you if you're dealing with Nestegg.

At least John Keyes and the other players dads have heeded my advice.

Mick, nobody heeds your advice.

I still have your text message about getting in touch with “nestegg” I still know the lawyer from your nestegg group told me your involved in that little group, amongst others. I’ve no problem doing this in public, have you? ?

And I reckon just about every person on this forum messaged me on Monday and were told the truth. That’s why you no longer frequent this place any more.

Also Mick, I think you might need to reply on the Wakefield board, you seem to have a couple of questions to answer on there, as that’s where you’ve been hiding.

I’ve told you I will keep calling your lies out

Do you not ever feel that your backed into a corner go back a few post and read again

You said on your show that he contacted you on Sunday from New Zealand?

Haha lying again

Its very concerning that we have someone in such a privledged position, who's spouting mis-truths and behaving in this manner. From the drunken swearing rant at the RFL, to this, if it was any other normal media person we'd be demanding he be removed from his position.

If a certain vice captain is here next year (hopefully) it be interesting to see how that interview would go. Wonder how said commentators employers would feel if the VC refused to be interviewed by said commentator.

Also if anyone feels like they've been here before, well it's because we have. You may remember I mentioned on the other thread mick had done this before under another alias (something like UNBELIVABULL) Well I didn't find that alias (I do remember Bullseye outing him out on here) but that was seperate and I don't think was regarding ownership. BUT I did come across this. Does anyone remember KCNBABT!!! Now Mick wasn't the prime suspect then but was certainly under suspicion. I must say I enjoy reading his previous posts of him pretending to be a sons dad and Roger outing him on it. Maybe just a coincidence though viewtopic.php?f=19&t=601831 viewtopic.php?f=19&t=601863

Also if anyone feels like they've been here before, well it's because we have. You may remember I mentioned on the other thread mick had done this before under another alias (something like UNBELIVABULL) Well I didn't find that alias (I do remember Bullseye outing him out on here) but that was seperate and I don't think was regarding ownership. BUT I did come across this. Does anyone remember KCNBABT!!! Now Mick wasn't the prime suspect then but was certainly under suspicion. I must say I enjoy reading his previous posts of him pretending to be a sons dad and Roger outing him on it. Maybe just a coincidence though viewtopic.php?f=19&t=601831 viewtopic.php?f=19&t=601863

Christ. You are a modern day Sherlock Holmes. I couldn't be faffed myself but keep digging.

To be fair to Mick, Chalmers could have text him Sunday to send wishes following the mugging. The comment regarding Going to ground is surely relating to being asked for info relating to accounts/sale etc and not replying to consortium. Two completely unrelated issues and likely two different forms of communication

Regarding Nestegg and Mr Gledhill - I for one have had enough. I do not know if there is any connection between these two posters but note that neither has denied what some on here have clearly implied.
I have learned to take anything Mr Gledhill “reports “ with a significant pinch of salt. Journalism / reporting should be more than regurgitating the last thing you heard from the last person you met.
He has understandably infuriated Roger, he has been exposed as a dissembler and I urge the moderators to remove him from this forum.
IF we have a team to support, I suspect that any retained players will remember the way he has angered Elliot’s father. And any new regime should act accordingly .