So is there still a conspiracy to relegate Wakefield?

Well no, its whoever made the decision to sign Harris without fully looking into the contracts and agreements that were already in place.

Some could argue that is when the country changed for the better but lets not go there....

Thank you for that. I was feeling a tad misrepresented but I appreciate you clarifying.



The inaction and appeasement that people perceive to be happening, honestly isn't. I can assure you that PMs fly relentlessly between the mods and the people you may think are being given free reign. I know for a fact that the person you mainly refer to feels quite the opposite and is aggrieved at some of the warnings and bans he has accrued.

Not even an explanation of why you feel the need to verbally abuse and/or try to censor others. Good guy? Aye right.

No doubt I am the un-named "problem poster" you referred to, and, lets be clear on this, I take people like you to task when you act all "superior" to others, think you have the right to criticise everyone else but nobody is allowed to answer back. Sadly, the last time you got offensive it took me quite some time to ensure that you got a friendly message from the mods because one of them seemed unable to want to deal with you. I wonder why this is?

It was only when one fair minded mod interjected that you got a message (I suspect) but, even then, after I had had a warning for pointing out your abuse and frequent AUP breaches, rather than the offender being brought to task earlier on in the piece.

Don't kid yourself. There is more of a chance that "Christians'" rolly eyes comment was more at utter embarrassment of your comment than anything else.

People like you seem to think that it is only people who get your "seal of approval" that can post on here. I reallly have no idea why? Why on earth anyone would want the Adey seal of approval is a mystery to me. Perhaps they would rather have you inside the tent spitting out than outside the tent spitting in?

Anyway, this post will most likely get removed as I am being critical of the uncriticisable. Thankfully, there are more and more people who can see you for what you really are Adey. You can fool some people some of the time.........

Adeybull is a bit pompous and self-aggrandising.

mystic eddie only seems to show up when things go bad just to say "I told you so".

There, done.

Stop bickering like children, no-one cares.

In fairness, I would have needed to warn you beforehand what was going to happen before I could come on to say that "I told you so."



Apart from that, spot on.

I imagine they still think there is, yes.

In fact, they won't like the fact that they are not being hard done to, they will have to find something else to be paranoid about.

Do you have family or friends? Because you don't exactly come across as even remotely possible to talk to.

"What do you want for tea, Dweeb?"
[iWhy? Who said anything about having food in the house? Can you even prove you can cook?[/i

"Pint, Dweeb?"
[iYou must be more specific, there are dozens of pint glasses behind the bar, which one are you talking about?[/i

Adeybull's questions weren't even directed at you, so why take the effort to not not not answer them?

i see even now, LeagueDweeb is trying to bluff his way through. I liked him better when he was 'hacked'.

The problem with all that pointless waffle you've just put up there dweeb, is that you haven't answered any of the questions.

That level of evasion, or answering a question with a question, is the sort of bollox that politicians try when they're talking to Paxman.

If the answer to any of those questions was No - you should just say so.
The fact that you can't/won't say no, is evasion. Which is standard politician fare when they either 1) don't know or 2) know the answer is yes, but are confident that there won't be any evidence of wrongdoing so can brazen it out.

Adeybull needs to realise the Bulls are in a mess because of the previous two sets of owners. His fixation with blaiming the RFL is Roswell like in it's level of conspiracy.


The Bulls have just under half a season to turn things round. Everyone at the club now knows where hey stand on points. There is no more uncertainty. Green has said he's not going to run for the hills.

Isn't it time to focus minds on beating Salford & picking up as many wins as possible to close the gap on Wakefield? They face London next, which should secure them two more league poijts. The Bulls face London in the final game of the season, which should secure them two points.

Beating a struggling Salford side is totally feasible, effectively meaning a 4 point gap given the predicted London results.

Is that really too much to overcome in a 10 period when facing several teams that are currently outside the top 8?

Dont forget guy,s wakey have tried their best to help you by giving you four points, all the best for the rest of the season.

You don't seem to be picking up on the fact that Adeybull's questions are based on a pre determined conspiracy theory.

Anyone can frame questions to try and substantiate a conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theorists never move on because they are unable to accept reality.

Who is supposed to answer these questions? Who are they aimed at? Why doesn't he get in touch with those he seems to think are responsible for answers?

Honestly, it really is laughable.

Exactly. All bickering to be done in PMs from now on.

When someone asks questions about things there is no actual evidence of, how can those questions be answered? That's how conspiracy theories get legs and perpetuate for years, thereby allowing conspiracy theorists to perpetuate their conspiracies.

Did you or did you not Kill Princess Diana in that Parisian tunnel? And were you ordered to do so by Prince Philip?

As ever your contorted response to a list of specific question, done in your inimicable and impenetrable " a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma" quoting style, is pure waffle, so why bother, when not a single "response" actually made any attempt to provide answers?

Things there are no evidence of? Allright then I'll start you with an easy one. (And there are lots)

Green's company appointed an administrator to come in.
We know that the minute he came in, he also "sold" the business in a pre-pack (to BB2014)
BB2014 had a temporary licence to run the club in SL.

This evidence proves that the entry into administration and immediate exit of the business to a new owner involved a significant degree of pre-planning. BB2014 couldn't have been the buyers under the pre-pack unless they had previously thrashed out the details and documents in advance with the not-yet-appointed administrator. Nor can they have bought the business unless they knew they would be accepted by the RFL to run it.

None of the above is a conspiracy theory.

I would agree 100%, and it wasn't just the compo, though I am sure that was one of the bigger nails in one of our series of coffins. We never recovered from it.

Shame we didn't do a deal with Leeds then quickly done an admin shuffle - when we still had semblance of a decent team. Six points then would of course have been irrelevant, except in terms of league position in the playoffs, which I think would have been a price worth paying.

Lets just make it nice and simple, shall we?

There is an alleged scenario, that we have all seen elucidated in part or in the whole by various protagonists and in various places, that runs something like:

1 - RFL (and, probably, necessity) want to see a change of ownership of the Club.

2 - RFL work with (and maybe advise and encourage) Moore & co to help them bring that about. This requires administration. (And, remember, administration is a rememdy not just for insolvency, but for intractible ownership disputes).

3 - Whilst this is in progress, RFL get Bulls vote for the new league structure proposals - proposals that some major club owners strongly and publically object to. Where the Bradford vote might just have been crucial.

4 - As soon as the deed is done to remove the previous owner, RFL withdraw their support for Moore & co, and leave them (and the Club) hung out to dry.

5 - This despite statements, including in the Adminsitrator's report, that Moore & Co intended to settle with the creditors. Statements that may or may not have been backed up by genuine intent, or by the means to do so.

Given that the RFL and Moore & Co have put out conflicting versions of what happened, plus various public and private contributions from various individual protagonsists, it is understandably very hard for an objective observer to form a reasoned view as to what actually happened - and why. Hence the ongoing debate, and feeling of injustice in some quarters.

If both sides could agree on the answers to the simple yes/no questions that I asked - plus a few more that others will doubtless think of - we could get the matter resolved very quickly indeed. Either something like outlined in the alleged scenario DID happen - in which case what has been done to the club would surely be manifestly unfair, or worse? - or it did NOT happen - in which case the club has suffered no more than it deserved, so tough - live with it.

I want to know which it is, since I really do not know. So we can indeed put an end to the conspiracy theories (or, for the conspiracy theorists, to the sycophantic acceptance of everything the RFL says) and have closure and move on.

All the disingenuous evasion by the likes of Dweeb does is adds fuel to the fire for the conspiracy theorists.

A dozen agreed yes or no answers - simple yes or no - and it gets put to bed for ever.

What is so hard about, or wrong in asking for that?

Why would the RFL "hang you out to dry" when they have previously bent over backwards to help you out with Iconicgate.

Not me mate I'm delighted as it was the only realistic chance of us staying up - that and it also being the only fair and just decision that any decent person could arrive at.

Was it? So ALL clubs that go into administration have SIX points deducted? Is that what you are saying?