We repeat what is said in the post above and our supplemental footnote.

Of the six names presently in our fold, some fans would likely recognise two thirds of the nesteggers; some may not.

Recognise that's as clear as mud mate, but it's the best we can do ... for now. Sorry

Well said Gledhill

I,ll ask you outright are Russ Mcfarlane or Stuart Duffy involved in your so called consortium?

NO !!!!!!!!!



The current mix (now just increased to 7 persons) is as follows - fans / politician / press and media / creditors / Bulls insider / SE associate / Counsel, and last, but most definitely [unot[/u least .... a meaningful backer and prospective investor.

Clearly most of the above are Bulls' fans and creditors as you'd expect; otherwise why would they bother.

All nesteggers are public spirited persons who want the Bulls to become more of a community based venture and for the fans voices to be heard and sustainably accounted for. We abhor asset stripping and shameless attempts at profiteering; not that we've seen much (if any) net profit at the Bulls for many a year. That, however, doesn't mean that cash hasn't been allegedly stripped out of the club in recent months and years.

We also want to see a formal investigation into the RFL's central and allegedly purposeful role in the decline of the Bulls in recent years.

We also have an occasional RFL informant along with other generally reliable informants.

What about a farmer ?

Your Wakefield informant isn’t very good AD, or whatever alias you use these days

If you buy the club, I'm going to support Fax.

This language reminds me of when Mick got banned from TRL a couple of times because he couldn't control himself over referees and supposed bias.

That understandable query has been answered elsewhere mate.

Loved the sitcom by the way Rigsby.

And the answer was ?

If we didn't love your sitcom we'd ask you to stop being so lazy. But as you were such a legend on the screen, we will repeat your question below, and restate our answer from earlier today:

Q - [i"So if your all bulls fans why are you so happy to let the new consortium discover the next impending storm once they have taken over instead of pre warning them."[/i

A - " .... we'd like to reveal what has been going on because it is not good. But we are bound by instructions from nestegg Counsel and the authorities who have instructed us not to give out any detail as to what the 'matter' may pertain to.

As for CB our legal has made it clear that as he is not currently a BB17 shareholder, Chris is presently a virtual legal non-entity in respect of the Bulls. That said, even if he and Sawyer etc gain an interest then it's for the authorities to formally approach the club director(s); not us.

We accept that this is somewhat of a nebulous response, but we have to take heed of advice. What we can offer, however, is that when the investigations are concluded and the story is ready to be published we will forewarn the forum. Deal?"

=#4000BFBTW Rigsby, please read the fine print mate; we didn't say we are 'all' Bulls fans, just most of us.

Right we now have Daddycool calling these idiots out. I’m sure Daddycool knows hell of a lot more about hell of a lot more than these fools.

Do we believe the owner of Wakefield Trinity or Gledhill, who just makes things up, as we all know.

It’s just pathetic roger. This is peoples lives we are talking about, not a boardroom memo on champ manager 92!

Totally agree. I’m so glad you have commented on this. This nonsense from this group needs to stop.
I am just a players dad, nothing else, I don’t know all the ins and outs. I only know what my son knows, which is quite limited really. Even the players are in the dark to a certain extent.
Certainly doesn’t help with this group of people who obviously don’t know as much as they reckon, and who continuously backtrack when challenged

Well said Craig. Think everyone things the same

Roger - what on earth has Mick the Gled done to upset you so much?

Indeed. I don’t know how the mods can’t see this as trolling tbh.

I bet Gledhill is loving all this having some semblance of "importnance" on this forum. I'd imagine any serious consortium would not want to associate itself with someone like MG?

Gledhill is an attention seeker wiv (Gledhill speak) possibly mental problems.

Can we just get back on topic. At the end of the day whether this person is mick, a high powered consortium or a group of kids playing in their bedroom, they want replies, they want challenging, they want attention.

This person has talked a lot, been challenged and the majority have made their mind up one way or another.

We know that no matter what happens moving forward they will make it fit the narrative and say they were right but couldn’t tell us before hand because of legal advice.

It’s a stressful time but just let it ride over you and stick to official lines you see with your own eyes.

Bulls4 - what you say on balance makes a lot of sense.

As the mods have said before we all need to take a reality check.

The nesteggers are NOT the enemy.

We have not caused ANY of the Bulls' former and current problems.

Agreed. Fact mods are allowing this to continue is quite frankly disgraceful.