In honour of the Cheltenham theme, some odds I'd give the runners and riders;

Stall 1 – Richard Lamb (&friends unknown - what is his angle/reason?) 10-11 (fav)
Stall 2 – BPA (&chancers) 18-1
Stall 3 – BCFC (probably my prefered option if they are serious) 12-1
Stall 4 – Omar Khan 100-1 (is he serious?)
Stall 5 – Koukash 500-1 (outsider as Im not sure this horse even exists!)

I heard that OK was part of Lamb's consortium

A wolf in sheeps clothing perhaps

I'll have a fiver on stall 3 - you better pay out on those odds Duckman lol

Thanks for the armchair psycho analysis. I never claimed straight talking was something to be admired, but this is an internet forum.

What you are basically doing, is taking my post, where I insulted no one, and using a pseudo psycho analysis of it to try assasinante my character!

That's quite slippery and slimey. I think if you are going to try and deduce much from someones actual character, based on what they write on a recreational internet forum you are going to get nowhere fast. At best your post was foolish, at worst unsavoury and devious!

The problem is you're not very good at this. If you care to read other people's posts, you'll notice that nobody has said anything about your character. They have talked about your behaviour, then questioned what your motivation is and whether you are deciding to behave how you do or if you can't actually help it.

You are rather boring, but you provide a good excuse for us to behave like 'typical Bulls fans'. It's hard not to be self congratulatory where the point of comparison is you.

After the OKBulls hitting the buffers last year it is not easy to see how OK would pass the RFL fit and proper person test to run a club after last year, or that given his style he could work in a consortium?

In case RAB readers forget where our friend is coming from, here's our graham with a quick reminder.



Can't understand at all why he's not welcomed with open arms on here.

This thread has run about half a dozen posts without one of our usual absolute ************** new friends lifting its arrse out of the slime to interject a fart. Is there a fault? I keep banging my screen, but nothing else is appearing.

If I had to pair Caisley with a party, it would most posibly be stall 3.

I still refuse to see any bulls with OK involved.

Its not pseudo-psychoanalysis, I think you will find 'asshat' is the correct technical term: Defined by the psychological bible 'The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders' or DSM, as [ithose with delusions of relevance and wisdom but so foolish as to be unable to distinguish between an ass and hat, and as such end up with their heads so far up their own 'ass' they are wearing it as a 'hat' Ergo 'Asshat'.[/i

Seems one has already arrived.

I doubt that most fans would put up with any buyout with OK involved. I certainly wouldn't hand any money over if he is there as I believe he would take every penny out till he got his money back and then what?

BCFC for me as I am one of the group of supporters who believe Odsal is just too much of a drain on the club and I think VP is a good stadium. They must believe it can be converted a little to hold rugby matches. I doubt they will get involved unless they believe they can make it work!

My concern with Lamb is WHY?
I would prefer someone who lives here and is a fan of the game. What would be in it for a Londoner?

Stall 6. The RFL under the leadership of head trainer "Woodsy" with stable boys Rimmer and Solly who have recently passed a "dope" test, they actually have more than one in there. They are being offered at 999-1

Apart from the head up the ass that sounds worringly like me.

Sorry, that post doesn't count. To meet FW's standards the post needs to be the best part of 4 years old and not actually relevant to what the rest of the thread is about.

Thanks FA. I think we’ve all got Flexy’s number now. He’s quite obviously a very poor troll who doesn’t realise people don’t just stick to one board.


Aaaaaanyway, back on topic. We should know a bit more by the end of the week.

I think some of these nags may have already thrown their riders - though there seems to be a suggestion one is trying to remount - in the Welsh sense - as he has already ******* the club once already!

Nice odds might be worth a cheeky quid

Lambs denied ok is involved so if he is then lambs lied to fans already. Ross had OK as a standalone bid in today's t&a.

How could The RFL even be considering OK as a serious bid? Oh hang on, it's the RFL after all, he is probably the favourite...

That's a good point. If he was to buy the Bulls, then surely they could no longer owe him any money as it would be like owing yourself some money. In which case, there could be no points deduction.

It's a genius plan. Go for it Omar....

Duckman can I have a pound each way on stall 4 please

I will lose all hope if Omar Khan gets anywhere near our club again. Seriously, I think I'd find it hard to even turn up to watch anymore.

I agree with the question about Lamb. Why? What is his motivation and interest in getting involved. I just can't see why he is so keen UNLESS he is just the spokesman for a big money consortium (in which case my view might well change!)

I'm not sure why everyone seems to be so incredibly negative about Bradford Park Avenue / Jay Wiley. If there is genuine money and credible business plan, they why not? At least its local people, and with an interest in the club. With Lamb we have a totally unknown quantity!

The Great Betrayal, 1907. Anything else I could say could be libellous so I'll keep it to myself..