I'm pretty sure it's a wind up. But if it were true it'd be laughable.

First with the detail as always.

James Roby is coming to us. You mark my words.

I actually don't think he's the player we need. Roby is better coming off the bench as an impact player. We need the sort of hooker that can start the game and organise the team. Diskin or Randall would be a much better option than Roby for us, and that's not to say that I rate Diskin and Randall higher, just that he would be a better fit for what we need.

To replace Newton we need an experienced player with a good rugby brain. Somebody mentioned Lestrange from Manly. Wouldn't be too disappointed with that, but I can't help thinking we'll have Rinaldi/Godwin for next season until someone better gets available.

Chad Randall is one of the best and smartest hookers in the league IMO. Shame we won't get him.

Hope we sign Craig Wing but doubt we will. My choice of Hookers would be...

1. Chad Randall - Quins
2. Matt Diskin - Leeds
3. Scott Moore - Saints

In that order, we dont want none of Drew, Obst, Rinaldi, Netherton or any other e.

Would that be for 4 mins?

Agree with that. If Wing signs for us I will eat 2 hats and a shoe. My shopping list would have to be a Hooker (I agree with what you have said) a Halfback and a centre. Then Sykes can cover for injury etc.

Is T.J. Hooker available? He has a proven track record of winning every week.

can't say i'm too disapointed were letting newton go as a further 2 year deal would have been too much of a risk imo. We really need to bring in some quality to replace him though. As dilligaf's said only real prospects in SL would be randall and diskin, beyond that we'd need to look overseas ( hopinh andy ellis rumour last week was just that - a rumour).
It would settle a lot of rumours if club would make a statement re burgess imo.

Cant help but feel that we're getting all bad news out of way at once , ie newton,sykes etc before making a major signing announcement.

If the club classed re-signing Sykes as bad news they wouldn't have signed him.

Would prefer to see Randall and Hopkirk. Then we could ghost through the defence.

think sykes re-signing as first choice would be classed by most fans as bad news. on the other hand if we've resigned him as a utility back and we announce a then it puts it in a very different light.

Deacon and Godwin to Harlequins... Randall to link up with his best buddy Beaver Menzies. We re-sign Rinaldi as back up to cover Hooker and Scrum half. BJ to 7 and new stand off signed in the shape of Wing.

JD on a school night, makes you feel much more positive about things...

I'd be happy if that happened

. Doesn't look likely though.

If Hopkirk was the one that was invisible and unable to impact on the physical world then we already have him.... actually several clones of him

Haven't we got him at right centre? Would explain how easy opposition players seem to run straight through him.

and why he seems to drop the ball so much. it just goes straight through his hands.

If we replace our diddy of a coach with the one currently coaching Randall then you just never know what could happen.

I like what you're saying but I think you mean wing [iand [/iRandall rotating at 9 because Pryce will be at 6. And why would we need to retain BJ at 7 when we're about to announce Myler as our new franchise player at 7??? You must have had one too many JD's......

or is that me?

Drew poop! You need a brain transplant - Castlefords gain then

I don't think anyone doubts Drew's ability. I certainly wouldn't, as he's a superb player.

The only doubt is his age and how much game time he can manage these days.

And his defence, which is not as much of a worry if those around you can be relied on.

I should not have classed Drew as poop, but would not take him because of his age.