Who is better

Any Wakefield fan will tell you, Platt is much better.

After the display at fb at the weekend then I have to say Platt looked better there.

Agreed with Mumby, Mick is starting to show some confidence. Don't recall him dropping the ball at Catalan. Halley on the other hand...

My votes with Mick.

Won us the game

Platt, give the lad a break!

Who is better where? Front row? Playing with his Wii?

On the Wing? Halley, probably.

At FB? This weekend QED. Platt. How the hell is the guy expected to have any confidence when everyone is on his back escapes me.

Thought that was Jeffries...even Halley says so.

The cut out pass yes but who put the ball down under the sticks

.... Gardiner at Saints is therefore the best wing in superleague as he has the most tries , and that has nothing to do with the world class centre playing inside of him .



As much as he gives you heart attacks at times Platt is the better full back and Halley on the wing.

Halley is much better IMO.

yeah and his showboating came within six seconds of costing us the match. He could have put it down in the corner and guaranteed a win but he had to show off and put it down under the sticks- could have backfired big style if hooter had gone while he was jogging across. And dont tell me he knew exactly how much time was left on clock.

On current form platt is our best fullback. sykes had a bit of a mare last week and we only improved in last 20 when platt came on and all match reports I've read say halley was having a mare on saturday apart from the winning try, which even he says jeffries did all the work for.

Looking on SLS Halley had some trouble under the high ball, but so would any fullback barring perhaps Steve Hampson of old. They were superb kicks that really put the pressure on.

As for who should play fullback, I reckon it should be whoever is in the best form. It's good to have competition for places and now we have it for fullback and wing.

exactly - halleys ideal player to have on bench as cover for backs especially whilst godwins out. He can cover wing and fullback and keep the incumbents on their toes. Hard to justify dropping sheriffe when he's scoring good trys and platts improving steadily. halley on bench stops them slipping into their comfort zones. Also wonder if we've considered using dave as cover for the halves, as he was originally signed as a halfback.

How could it have backfired?

Would the hooter going have caused him to drop the ball, or kick it out?

Did you not know he has a phobia of hooters, call yourself a fan!

try's not complete till he grounds it - if hooter had gone before he grounded it wouldnt have been a try

What would have happened?

end of game.

Huh?

Oh right.

When did this new rule come in? I've obviously missed it.

pretty certain I've seen tries disallowed through not been grounded before hooter sounds in past. other scenario would have been a catalans player shoving him into touch while he was coming across to the sticks and if you watch the try back there were a few cats players within reach. Should have grounded the ball the instant he crossed - the conversion wasnt necessary to ensure the result.

He seems to be under the impression that they were playing a game of football

maybe Im imagining seeeing it before - wouldnt be the first time

I was going to offer to lend you my spade but it looks like you don't need it