Everybody knows that is not the case, including the players.

The easiest way to avoid a ban is not to instigate situations where punches are thrown. When was the last time Jammer got a ban? Doesn't make him any less of a prop.

As for inconsistency between Flower and Perry - I can't really recall the Cru player fighting before, I can think of loads of times Perry has (not in a Saints shirt, but point stands nonetheless).

There certainly is inconsistency though; Peacock seems to have free reign when it comes to putting his dukes up.

That's what I mean, countless fights have gone by without anybody batting an eye lid, why should Perry get banned for this one.

Looks to me like they've hung him on his reputation and that he's a marked man.

Which could be problematic if he ever actually does anything wrong. Because they can now say he's got history and give him extra harsh bans.

The club should formally complain about it.

Seconded .. the RFL are more bent than FIFA

But we can't deny that he DOES have a reputation for fighting.

Nobody seems bothered about Lima picking up bans based on his/Melbourne's rep in Oz, why the difference in opinion with Perry?

Surely it should be a 2 match ban, can't perry slap someone else?

I mean it would be good if he could get banned for the exiles game too

Because its not right. I dont care about Lima and didnt know he had got a ban based on his NRL rep, if that was so then the same principle would apply.

While Lima was pretty much guilty on every occasion he was charged. I'd be hard pushed to believe that his and Melbourne's reputation for those tactics, didn't in some way have an effect on the way he was treated by the RFL. In that Jeff received harsher sentences than a player without Lima's previous history would.

So if you have a history of specific foul play in the NRL, your first similar offence in SL should be met with no ban due to a "clean slate" disciplinary record? Not sure I agree with that.

Perry has himself to blame unfortunately - we can squeal about the RFL all we want but the simple answer is to not go around punching people and you won't get a ban.

I think the point is though the other fella got no ban. He threw punches too?

Consistency?????

We didnt need him tonight anyway so the RFL did us a favour by giving him a nice rest in the sun.

Big fight between Wigan and Catalans, wonder if anybody gets banned?

My guess is ....

no-one will get a ban.

No one will even be charged. Perry is just being targeted by the RFL. They would have banned him for scowling.

Same as Hull v Wigan, Tompkins S runs in.

Grade b offence 1 match + repeat offence 1 match - exiles box office factor 2 = 0

No case to answer.

Now we will get to see if Perry was targeted or not. It's a disgrace if nothing comes of it.

If Lockers and Joel T plus Charnley are charged it would mean Lockers and Joel missing the exiles game. Sam T looks as if he won't make the exiles game either. We will end up with no team. Hope they (RFL) don't come calling on our halfbacks to replace him as Maguire of Leeds is injured as well.

What's wrong with Sam Tomkins?

I honestly think the RFL did target perry as he's got a reputation as a hard man and they wanted to prove a point.

From the radio commentary he was limping heavily for most of the second half. Sam's a tough little fella though and I'd expect him to do everything he can to play on Friday.

Unlike one of our young "superstar" who won't play if hurts his finger.

That question really should be a thread on its own.

fight in the hull derby today as well as the pies game last night looks like a few bans handed out at red hall this week i think not forgot it not saints