2010 A Lyon Odyssey..

""tm - tl gets embarrassed on thread"" shock!

You are too sensitive for this claptrap!

Too sensitive or acutely aware of the b0ll0cks you post on a regular basis?

Too sensitive.

How odd when made to look foolish you are "Fishing." If anyone did this on the Wigan board you'd be crying like a little girl.

You should know me better by now as I do my research before posting.
I knew how old Lyon would be, obviously better than some on here.

FWIW, Saints have four of the oldest players in Superleague playing for them, and that is correct.

At least they'll be playing at their own ground and not Leigh like the Wigan old 'uns.



[urlhttp://viewtopic.php?t=392628&start=0[/url

Aye but still not as many of the foreign legion as Wigan have.

May be oldest, but also still 4 of the best.

I find Rogues obsession with age touching, he should be proof unto himself that age is no obstacle

Get Back On Topic



Jamie Lyon will be a Saint for next season.

I'll hunt you down if he isn't!

Me too!

That's the nicest thing you've EVER said about me.

Could this be the start of a new young RLfans relationship?

Doubt it.

I'm sure of it.

My street cred would be shot to pieces.

Me three

Oh the joy!!

And your point is? How old do you think I was when I did my VT? That worked, didnt it? If theyre good enough theyre young enough

They said the same thing about Gary Glitter

It's not correct, and typing "and that is correct" at the end doesn't make any more so.

Leeds' four oldest players add up to a total of two years older than Saints four oldest players total years.

So, that's Saints and Leeds with four oldish players in their teams and Leeds being the slightly older. Now ask yourself this.... who are the two best teams in the superleague? Should Saints and Leeds learn from your wisdom and get rid of these older players because the succes of your team proves Saints and Leeds obviously don't know what they are doing?

You don't have to answer the questions BTW. I already know the answer. If you want to see some silver go and have a look at the trophy rooms of these old teams.

Of course it's correct, four of means exactly that. It doesn't say the four oldest or that other clubs don't have four older players it does what it says on the tin.