Quote ="Dux"The most fair system is undoubtedly first past the post, with round robin home and away fixtures. So in purely sporting terms, that is the right way to do it.
'"
McClennan wrote a rather dramatic post about proving your might in the arena against the best, and how in ye olden times to become the champion at something you would have to seek out the current holder and beat them.
Whilst the league format seems a comprehensive examination, how many sports actually use it to decide trophies?
The American sports all use playoffs, but we know those guys are a bit zazzy, so perhaps we shouldn't look to closely. However, tennis, golf (i think), boxing, athletics and other olympic type events, hell - even snooker, their trophies are all decided by knockouts. Sure, there's seeding and ranking systems, but that could be deemed as the role of our league.
I'm not a fan of our playoff format, as too much dross got let in and to allow over half the league in seems to belittle the acheivemnt of qualifying, but doing it on GF night, on the biggest stage, against the best opposition is the mark of a real champion. The playoffs are a must.
Question, did any of you guys [ifeel[/i like champions the years we topped the league and then got bumped by Leeds when we had the chance to show who was the better team over 80 mins?