Fandabydosy. I don't care about the lack of cladding. It still looks awesome.

thanks Chair - was beginning to think you'd taken the week off along with the official Saints photographer who hasn't posted any pics for a while.

Great shots.

A small observation over the cladding...

The south west corner has 10 grey clad sections, but the south east section only has 6 grey clad sections. I wonder if the south east has 4 more sections yet to clad? Or maybe the south red faced part is offset towards the east?

Anyone have access to the plans to show if this offset is correct?

Not a point of earth shattering importance I know but people have posted questions on more minor points than this.

The PA box/ Police control room is in the south west corner which therefore requires to be clad, as do the lift shafts to the high level disabled section of the west stand. No such box exists in the south eastern part of the stadium, nor are there high level disabled facilities in the eastern part of the stadium.
There is also the quite interesting fact that every different stand within the stadium is a different size, and of slightly different design. This is a change from the usual flatpack cookie cutter stadiums we see built in the uk.

I do like the way we can call the home and away ends the Western Terrace and the Eastern Terraceicon_wink.gif

Have you seen the pics on redvee behind the stands? Bone dry, cladding is not required IMO.

North west corner looks like the worst spot to be.

hate to keep on about this, the stadium is fantastic, but there is very little cover in the Northeast and the Northwest corners of the ground, also check out the pics on redvee and see how far the rain has come up the front of the terrace, this of course cannot be helped but it will also come in from behind the above mentioned corners with the aid of the wind.
Go and have a look at how open these corners are it will effect seated and standing fans, granted not a lot of fans will be effected but some will.

these are our own seated fans, not bothered about the Northeast corner, they are for away fans.

They do look a little exposed, however perhaps not as bad as people think.

Look closely and you will see that the ends of the stands are walkways, so no speccies will be sat right on the end of the stand, they will actually be a few metres in. This will mean they have a couple of extra metres of roof cover, in addition to the curved roof in the corner. This will make it harder for the rain to get to them.

I do however think that seats in the far corners will be a bit like those on the front couple of rows, in that if the wind and rain are blowing the wrong way you can expect some rain getting to you, but i doubt if people will get a soaking.

The open corners are my only real bugbear with the new stadium. I would have liked them to be at least partially cladded, upto say the height of the North stand seated area. This would leave an open bit at the top but would make the stadium look and feel more enclosed.

I regard the open backs of the stands to be an opportunity. In summer months on a nice warm evening, the natural light will potentially make for a more pleasant drinking experience, than being stuck in an airless claustrophobic concrete cavern, with nothing but flickering neon lights to keep away the dark. Its only really in February, March and early April that the open backs will make for potentially a bracing experience. The vast majority of the season will be played in mild to warm, though often wet conditions.
Furthermore re the open backs, one of the things i have not liked about Widnes is that the North stand bar areas can be a bit of a sweat box in summer due to their fully enclosed nature.

www.saintsrlfc.com/news/page/1254 the saints official photographer has been about again. Airel shop looks awesome!

www.saintsrlfc.com/news/page/1254 the saints official photographer has been about again. Airel shop looks awesome!

It does indeedy.

Yep, looks brilliant from above as it looks pretty much complete from that angle.

I was critical earlier in the thread about the block of white seats with the redvee, but I must put that down to the poor quality of the image, as it actually looks very nice.

The pics of the concourses in the North Stand are very interesting, and actually would be a very nice design if left open like that (still can't actually make out if this will be the case or not due to all the various views on it here!). The main concern is the weather, but on a summer's day, it would be very nice with the fresh air coming in. I assume the ends at least will definitely be left open like that?

As for the views from the inside, I actually think the open backs look impressive, and I thinkj it would look better if the North is kept open, as it adds a level of balance to the ground. Not talking about the comfort and protection from the elements, simply the look of the place.

Re the open back of the stadium
I was watching a documentary a while ago on why they keep having to relay the Wembley pitch all the time (and quite often at the DW) the concencus with the experts was a lack of air flow in such an enclosed stadium. I believe it was Barcelona's stadium, or some other monster spanish one that the pitch in fact is mechanically lowered and roled out of the stadium after games to allow the pitch to "breath"
So the partially open backs are probably designed by much cleverer people than ourselves to ensure that the home of the saints continues to have the best pitch in the land

But if we were cutting edge we'd have an ipitch like Widnes do.

Jesus, man. Do you not know anything? Saints are waiting for the iPitch 4 to come out. Colour-changing grass. Widnes will most likely have to keep rebooting theirs.

I know that this is a problem at all the big stadiums like Wembley, Old Trafford etc. but at our place how can that be the issue when we have four huge corners letting air in?

I think other problems have caused issues with our pitch in the past. It seems to be sorted now though, the pitch has been quality this year even at the start of the season.

Leeds pitch seems to be the worst around at the start of every season.

Just a question to those of you who used to stand on the popular side.... are you happy being moved to behind the goals or would you rather have down the side? Will it kill the atmosphere? I see similar problems at Salford with them moving the shed.

I think this picture illustrates your point, you can see clearly the differences in the SE and SW corners and hence the differences in cladding

There's a small bit about the new bridge in the public notices section of the St Helens reporter today saying work expected to last 3 months.

Is the away end standing and how many will it fit?

Looks great on the pictures

46 seated, 18 wheel chair, 3940 standing, 4004 in total, plus seating available in the North stand.

Cheers

Great size for an away end should be full against us and the goons, standing is best.

I will imagine your 1st season will have a few sell outs with people wanting to see the new stadium.

New stadium looks mustard.

Looks more Red and white to me. Seriously though it looks superb and I can't wait for next season to start. Especially with that nice shiny trophy taking centre stage.