Not true,
Even if Saints lose they will be at home the week after.

If they win they will be at home the week after that.

In this new amazing uncomplicated playoff system.


FWIW I wouldnt be suprised if the King quit if he was faced with another year of Potter

It's really not that difficult is it?


If an old barsteward like me can figure it out then I'm sure the majority of spreadsheet wizards on here should be able to do the same.

hasnt he been quoted as saying he wants to play at the new stadium.

sorted then, youve got him till his 40th birthday

Cunningham is a perfect example of how stats don't tell the full story of a players abilities and influences on their sides.

His aren't that impressive this year yet when you watch him play for Saints you see the lift he gives all the rest of the side when he's on the field. I really notice it when he comes back on for his 2nd spell after being subbed especially if Saints are struggling. In the semi against Huddersfield he was awesome i thought when he came back on with you 22-8(something like that) down. He lifted the side and took the battle to Huddersfield on his own at times. His will to win and determination are as huge as ever and he looks to me to have at least another year in him.

Saints would be mad imo to let him go(if they have the choice) especially given the side has and is losing a couple of experienced heads.

Quite frankly, I would keep KC as long as he wants
If he wants to play at the new stadium, Great

Roby at 13, with moore as a replacement

Good post. I could understand if he gave it up if we won SL this year, but if not he's definitely got another year in him. Eastmond, Moore and Roby are all versatile enough to play in other positions for another season.

Already stated on other KC posts for me I'd love him to stay if he's willing too

9 Cunningham
13 Moore
Sub Roby

All interchangable and ofc Moore offers good cover at 6 & 7

How dare you post sense on this board! This board is reserves for the negative rugby league fans, now toodle pips

A team in transition like yours is becoming need the stability, guile and leadership of Cunningham.

You let him go at your peril.

www.sthelensreporter.co.uk/st-he ... 5647763.jp LONG LIVE THE KING Kieron to stay another year

www.sthelensreporter.co.uk/st-he ... 5647763.jp LONG LIVE THE KING Kieron to stay another year

If he plays on, plenty players will be worried about losing their heads.

=redStop trolling, warning #1

Good

Interesting to see how it all plans out, but great news for Saints and the game!

BAN HIM!!!

Hopefully means Robes will go to 13 with Cunningham and Moore rotating at 9 next year.

www.saintsrlfc.com/news/2073 its official

www.saintsrlfc.com/news/2073 its official

got to be. I cant see a place for all 3 at hooker, unless KC has agreed to play a supporting role to the other 2.

Only problem has been the baffling tactic of MP to chuck anyone at 13. For me it is a position that Roby could be effective at because he has good rugby nous and runs harder then his build would suggest.

Great News!

It could be the development of Roby from a niche player to the top class player he has the potential to be. He has a solid kicking game which is always nice (since Tommy God we've relied on Long, now we'll have Roby Moore, Arnold, Wheeler, Pryce (when he's on the field) and Wilkin).

Roby played a lot of his academy rugby at loose forward.

I think this is good news - we talk now of players over 30 as being ancient, but when I first began watching in the mid-eighties, people used to say that a prop doesn't come good till he's 32 ! The game has speeded up, and for an amateur, playing beyond 30 can be pretty tough on the body, but for a full time athlete, who has intensive physical preparation, then as long as he avoids injury, there's no reason why he can't carry on at a very high level for longer than your average Joe could. After all, speed was never a key component of Cunningham's game, and I'd be very surprised if he was any less powerful now than he was as a 20 year-old.

It does mean, however, that we are very likely to see Moore or Roby playing a whole new position. Personally, I think Roby hasn't got a position that isn't hooker. His whole game is based around darting from the ruck, his passing isn't good enough for halfback and I'm not aware of a kicking game from him. He's too small for the rest of the pack positions. At a push you could say centre, but that's sorted for next year with Soliola and Gidley. So I guess he stays as interchange hooker. That means if Moore is being brought back, then he's not destined for the hooking spot. You've got to be looking at scrum-half for him, and he has played there a bit before. Maybe the coaches have decided that Eastmond isn't quite ready to take on that role yet.

Keiron, Keiron, Keiron.