5 metres is atrocious and screams 'I don't want to be injured for next week'.

Re Wilkin in general, I think for this team he has to either be a ball playing 13 like SOL or be at 6. Let Greenwood and Vea make metres and let Wilkin stick to what he's good at, lots of tackles, getting involved with plays and using his decent kicking game to take the burden from Walsh.

I think he's spent that long in the halves since 2013 he is actually quite competent at it now and I'd have him in the halves over Turner every day of the week. He was our best player in 2013 at 7 and completely outshone Burns last year at 7. Whenever he is asked to fill in there he doesn't go hiding but for whatever reason takes a lot of flack when playing out of position. There's a general consensus that he demands to play 7 which I have never understood. Presumably its drawn from the same lot who consistently mention his work for the BBC as if its at all relevant to his RL career.

Although his Salford stats are diabolical, there is no other captain in that side. Roby doesn't say 2 words, and Walmsley isn't experienced enough yet.

I know talk is cheap, but it'll be interesting to hear his appraisal of that performance.

I would play Wilkin at 7 before Walsh.

I have £5 on use of the phase "elite sport" at least 20 times during the programme.

Yup

Did anyone watch it last night? I couldn't bring myself to waste sleep on it. What excuses did he make this time?