In Agar's interview he suggested Eastmond might receive a few high balls, does that suggest he might play full back tonight? Probably, simply misunderstood this!

In addition, I got the impression he was saying two out (Tetevano and King) and one in (Eastmond) with a decision to be made on the final bench spot. Be interesting what the team is if Eastmond is put at full back.

Exactly this,always a crackdown,remember us having Lyon sent off for a shot on Rob Burrow and then slowly over time those kind of hits got ignored again. Anyway good luck for the rest of the season.

Eastmond can’t possible play FB when we have no halves available!

Broadbent
Briscoe
A Sutcliffe
Mellor
Briscoe
L Sutcliffe
Eastmond
Oledski
Leeming
Prior
Martin
Walters
Smith

Dwyer
Thompson
Donaldson
Gannon

I’m hearing that Sutcliffe still out so likely Eastmond and Smith. Sutcliffe, Hurrell and Handley all back next week. I personally hope the club give Edwards a shot in the centres tonight like they have done Hall.

Did agars interview give the impression that ‘one in two out’ means Sutcliffe and Thompson won’t play again this week?

I got the impression that a youngster would fill the final spot, however, he didn't really make it clear. He did not comment on whether Sutcliffe or Thompson would play.

I found his comment about Eastmond handling the high balls strange if he is playing half back but can't see how he cannot play half back given our lack of half back options.

King and tet out,eastmond in is what I thought.

I can’t find the part in the interview that mentions high balls.

But only 1 in suggests no Thompson and Sutcliffe.

I think Agar mentions it, but must mean when kicking across to the wing. There's no way he will play fullback!!

Eyeballs not High Balls!!

Maybe the high balls he was referencing was the type of passes he will get from our hookers???

Kid has only ever played RL with Cunningham and Roby providing him service. Hes in a for a shock tonight.

Yes, this I remember. As in a lot of people looking to see how he goes on.

Agar commnents this week suggest it might just be Eastmond coming in from missing senior players like others have said can see our 17 being:

Broadbent
T.Briscoe
Mellor
A.Sutcliffe
L.Briscoe
Smith
Eastmond
Oledzki
Leeming
Prior
Walters
Martin
Donaldson

Subs
Dwyer
O'Connor
Edwards
Gannon.

We're obvious underdogs again but if we have the same in enthusiasm and effort as last week hopefully we give ourselves a fighting chance.

Apologies, must be my poor hearing!

Yes, hope we have the same heart and fight as last week. If so, I will be happy regardless of the score.

Good point.Maybe a few mind games going on.

Interesting martin over smith in the halves suppose they might interchange. No Sutcliffe or thompson as thought so just eastmond in

Strange Hall is one ne bench, Mellor at centre and I suppose Hall can come on and Mellor can shift into the pack.

Thought Edwards might have got in, although two 17 year olds on the bench is a big risk!

Huge effort exerted on Saturday, short turnaround, could end up as a very heavy loss here.

I don't know, the numbers in terms of possession, territory and meters weren't massively against leeds on sat and they weren't 'backs against the wall'. The work was well distributed with so many forwards and all the talk is positive so a performance similar will be a moral victory again, we'll see...

Last tackle options already poor, game will be won and lost in the halves today

Martin giving 6 again, then shoots out of the line creating a gap in defence.

That try sims up the difference between the teams tonight already.
We have 4 or 5 chances to put in an attacking kick and take none of them.
Hastings puts in one and they score.

Very pleased with the attitude again yes set finishes are poor but we'll go well when key players return. Cant ask much more so far with the team.out.

We've done pretty well, but both those trys are very soft.