Stinger. May need some ice for that one.

Bye bye Kirkey, Kirkey bye bye.



No room for he, or McShane in that squad. JJB on the bench methinks.

BUT....somehow I believe Kirke will work his conniving magic to once again convince his coach to sit him on the bench.... maybe even for the duration of the whole match yet again. Happy days.

Kirke > Moore for me Nantwich.

Based purely on form.

Although I'd be tempted to say both in front of clarkson with bailey continuing at loose. And no Mcshane for me

Pretty easy to maintain form if sat on a bench for 80 mins



Yep Clarkson deserves to be dropped after the not passing debacle....which could have been VERY costly indeed.

I would like to see Bailey at LF long term now: I believe he is much more effective and intimidating out wide

yep +1

Why Kirke wasn't used at Salford I have no idea - it makes no sense whatsoever unless I've missed an explanation somewhere.

Prior to that he has contributed very well this year. I don't particularly like a 4 prop rotation that contains Moore and Leuluai. I'd go for solid and reliable on this occasion.

I wouldn't drop Clarkson based on one error, that would be silly. Would you leave McGuire or Sinfield out for the same reason. I just he has stalled slightly in his development and it wouldn't do any harm for him to have a couple of weeks away from the first team to work on the attacking side of his game.

I think both Kirke and Moore would be unlucky to lose their places in the team. I'd consider dropping Clarkson based on current form

I can't see him putting JJB in the squad then not playing him, so McShane to miss out and what should be probably Kirke but i wouldn't be surprised to see Moore dropped with Kirke showing his amazing powers of continued selection and reverting to the 4th prop.

Come on admit it, your obsessed by me aint you?

Not surprising, as I am indeed far more knowledgeable and with a much better personality than you.

But Gareth, just for the record, the feeling isn't mutual. I couldn't really care less about your posts.

I sure is Buddy!

Which of your personalities are you referring to?

You were doing a good job of creating that impression recently but you let yourself slip with this response.

Admit it, you're on LSD. Admission is the first step to getting help.

need a strong pack i bet pitts fancies this one

Kirke has played the best two games I've ever seen him play, he also dosent have offloading syndrome like more which could have been just as costly as the clarkson error IMO

From a coaching point of view I'd have thought it would make sense having a prop run at half back centres close to the tryline. With Bailey at loose youll get someone whose willing to come into the middle to do the tough stuff as well but also has the fitness and all roundedness to acctually be a loose

They all fancy this one, there well up for it and so are we

Whooooooo get her!!

Its like grand final night for hull

No just love beat you smug f@@kers

Bet you have forgotten what that feels like!

Try [itheir[/i or [ithey're[/i next time......see if you can guess which one is the actual correct one to use here.

Be good to see JJB back: with Hauraki playing in U20's this weekend and both Burrow and Watkins almost ready it bodes well for the tough upcoming fixtures

Come on Juan .....you know none of these matter as long as we have the commanding Bailey at LF

Bless you

No bailey

What a bell-end!

Ruled out through illness, JJb starts at 13, mcshane the other to drop out of the 19, he played in the 20s 62-10 win over FC

Shame he was unable to tackle Tickle for try 1