If Leeds do not win this by 20+ then we might just make the playoffs in 8th place

Donald usually plays better when his centre doesn't constantly knock-on.

Well,

ignoring the stupid mention of Ellis (he does not play for the Rhinos )



In fairness to McGuire & Burrows - IF they ran "sideways", then they could hardly score the number of tries they have over the past years.

Compare the Tries they have scored with any other Superleague 6 & 7 & then try & post something sensible matey.

Ps have you been drinking

Given the squad selected and the need imo to rest player's for huddersfield on saturday i'd go with..
Webb
Bjb
Watkins
Gibson
Hall
Mcguire
Burrow
Bailey
Buderus
Burgess
Jjb
Ablett
Sinfield

Kirke
Ali
Diskin
Leuleui.

Nice effort, I actually thought this was a serious post for a brief moment.

Who's Buderus?

He's got a point though don't you think.

What's with all the Carl Ablett bashing?...

1. You are kidding right?

2. No, we attend all away games but limited home games because of Leeds supporters IMO being the lowest common denominator in SL.

3. See above.

Advertised through the T&A, Bradford are an exceptional club for juniors, the tickets worked out at £8 adults and £2 children!!

|Do you want me to spell it out, Salford shouldn't have received a franchise, shocking ground, poor side, poor fan base, had enough chances and consistently failed.

Poor fan base?

That's because they dont get bandwagoners from Halifax who have deserted their local club because they got relegated and Leeds won the title.

No born in Leeds, educated in Bradford, employed in London, returned to Bradford and now live in Halifax.

PS

More of my money now goes to Halifax than Leeds, and TBH I enjoy Halifax home games more than the games at Leeds.

Having said that I haven't missed a Leeds away game for three years.

i think magic wand you need to shove your wand where the sun dont shine,,we won the franchise fair and sguare i hope we do win today the days of glory for you could soon be over and then see how it feels to be the loosers

Loose=
1. superl. - Unbound; untied; unsewed; not attached, fastened, fixed, or confined; as, the loose sheets of a book.

2. superl. - Free from constraint or obligation; not bound by duty, habit, etc. ; -- with from or of.

3. superl. - Not tight or close; as, a loose garment.

4. superl. - Not dense, close, compact, or crowded; as, a cloth of loose texture.

5. superl. - Not precise or exact; vague; indeterminate; as, a loose style, or way of reasoning.

6. superl. - Not strict in matters of morality; not rigid according to some standard of right.

7. superl. - Unconnected; rambling.

8. superl. - Lax; not costive; having lax bowels.

9. superl. - Dissolute; unchaste; as, a loose man or woman.

10. superl. - Containing or consisting of obscene or unchaste language; as, a loose epistle.

11. Noun - Freedom from restraint.

12. Noun - A letting go; discharge.

13. a. - To untie or unbind; to free from any fastening; to remove the shackles or fastenings of; to set free; to relieve.

14. a. - To release from anything obligatory or burdensome; to disengage; hence, to absolve; to remit.

15. a. - To relax; to loosen; to make less strict.

16. a. - To solve; to interpret.

17. v. i. - To set sail.



Lose =
1. v. t. - To part with unintentionally or unwillingly, as by accident, misfortune, negligence, penalty, forfeit, etc.; to be deprived of; as, to lose money from one's purse or pocket, or in business or gaming; to lose an arm or a leg by amputation; to lose men in battle.

2. v. t. - To cease to have; to possess no longer; to suffer diminution of; as, to lose one's relish for anything; to lose one's health.

3. v. t. - Not to employ; to employ ineffectually; to throw away; to waste;ander; as, to lose a day; to lose the benefits of instruction.

4. v. t. - To wander from; to miss, so as not to be able to and; to go astray from; as, to lose one's way.

5. v. t. - To ruin; to destroy; as destroy; as, the ship was lost on the ledge.

6. v. t. - To be deprived of the view of; to cease to see or know the whereabouts of; as, he lost his companion in the crowd.

7. v. t. - To fail to obtain or enjoy; to fail to gain or win; hence, to fail to catch with the mind or senses; to miss; as, I lost a part of what he said.

8. v. t. - To cause to part with; to deprive of.

9. v. t. - To prevent from gaining or obtaining.

10. v. i. - To suffer loss, disadvantage, or defeat; to be worse off, esp. as the result of any kind of contest.

Sorry about the pedantics but it rubs my rhubarb the wrong way.

Hey, if I wanted to know what being a loser is all about I can just ask you.

arent you from Halifax Titchy?

Yes, and you point loz?

your calling someone from Halifax a loser?

Sorry Loz, you have lost me, I live in Halifax, the Salford fan is from Salford?

Have the Barmy Army hit the shandy a little early?

Not ALL Salford fans are from Salford....Just like , not ALL Leeds fans have six fingers...geddit?

Read the rest of the thread, I am talking about beezer who's location is Salford.

Where did I say anything about the point you raised?

Do you need any more people to spell it out for you, Halifax shouldn't have received a a franchise, shocking ground (worse than the Willows), poor side (finished below Salford for several years consecutively), poor fan base (consistetly smaller crowds than Salford), had enough chances and consistently failed (were given a place in the original SL, which Salford weren't, and proved they couldn't hack it over a number of years) ... and that's without mentioning financial mismanagement, the ridiculous length of time it took to develop The Shay, the fact that Fax aren't even running a reserve squad this year, Widnes and Leigh deserving a franchise more than Fax, ... need I go on?



That said I like Halifax, made financial contributions towards the club when their future was in doubt, like the town (worked there for a while and have family there too) and always enjoy my trips to The Shay (especially in the Colin Dixon cup matches).

Not sure why I'm trying to reason with someone who was "educated in Bradford" though (oxymoron?!)


In an attempt to bring the thread back on-topic, I full expect Leeds to win by at least 20 today, at a canter.

Worse than the Willows, when did you last visit the Shay, the stand is now complete and the ground is better than the majority in SL.

That poor side would give Salford a serious run for their money if played right now, in fact Halifax have been consistently building now for three years without the meal ticket Salford have been afforded by the RFL.

The fan base for Halifax is considerably more than that of Salford, in fact if Halifax had been given a franchise those who joined the Bradford bandwagon would return, how are Salford going to bring new fans into the club?

The mismanagement of Halifax is too complicated to explain on a forum, but rest assured the people responsible have are no longer involved with the club.

Halifax in terms of tradition are on a different planet to Salford so I suggest you don't go there, in fact its safe to say salford have no history.

well done today to the true red devils !!

ps Leeds, get used to being in our slipstream. Its about time the real new power in yorkshire came to the fore. We've had too long of you and Bradford, with your endless referee bleating and your quaint ramshackle grounds, being near the top. Its time for us to reclaim our rightful place as the flag bearer for the white rose county.

see you saturday. Its going to hurt !!