Unless he stops playing now it would seem pretty clear wouldn't it. He will play more games and therefore the strike rate will reduce.

Or have I missed something?

No thats how I worked it out, unless I am misunderstanding the more games he plays without scoring the lower his strike rate would get.

if he continues at the same strike rate of 0.039 his strike rate will be ......

yes you've guessed it 0.039. Which will still be higher than Jamie Matthiou at 0.029.

unless I am very wrong I would think the

has not been earned in this case!

you are very wrong

I get what you mean now, but wasnt what I meant. He hasnt scored for a few years now and if that continues and he continues to play then he will end up below Mathiou.

There is that better

But his strike rate for the last 3 years isn't 0.039. So if he follows the next 3 years the same rate of scoring as his last 3, then the rate will come down.

Bailey didn't score at all in 2009, 2010 or so far in 2011 so he's perfectly right to say if he carries on in that fashion he'll finish behind Mathiou.

Now that I agree with but that is different to



when Ferdy quoted the strike rate provided for Bailey

If he'd said "At Bailey's [icurrent[/i rate of scoring" that would have been more subjective and open to interpretation.

As clarified earlier that is infact what i meant. if bailey continues as he has for the last few years he will be below mathiou.

Thanks for being pedantic though!

Not being pedantic and you might note that my only reply after your clarification was to a point raised by Gotcha.

You quoted figures and made a comment. if your comment was not meant to reflect the quoted figures then you should have clarified. If you didn't don't blame someone elsre for having issue with your statement.

That worked out pretty well I thought.

All I can add is:

Classic Bailey

It's my major issue with a prop's quality. Try scoring ration.

No, really it is.

Don't think he's actually scored a try since 2007...closest he's come is probably the Cup Final last year

Ryan Bailey's 9 tries for Leeds:

13/03/2004 ..... CC ..... St Helens ..... Knowsley Road ..... Appearance Number 36
08/10/2004 ..... PO ..... Wigan ..... Headingley ..... Appearance Number 60
07/08/2005 ..... SL ..... Leigh ..... Hilton Park ..... Appearance Number 85
07/08/2005 ..... SL ..... Leigh ..... Hilton Park ..... Appearance Number 85
05/03/2006 ..... SL ..... Castleford ..... Headingley ..... Appearance Number 96
26/05/2006 ..... SL ..... Bradford ..... Odsal ..... Appearance Number 108
16/02/2007 ..... SL ..... Hull ..... Headingley ..... Appearance Number 124
16/03/2007 ..... SL ..... Wakefield ..... Belle Vue ..... Appearance Number 128
20/07/2007 ..... SL ..... Wakefield ..... Headingley ..... Appearance Number 144

That was 89 Bailey appearances ago which represents his longest wait to add to his tally.

Another indicator that Bailey's ability to win a collision and break a tackle, just like his go forward in general, is well below average

2004 was clearly his best season as reflected in his international call up's that year, but nothing worthy of mention ever since.

He's a player who sadly never kicked on, instead being content with being just an average SL player.

Andy Wilson says on twitter that Ben Cross could be at widnes next season and maybe on a short term deal at WIGAN !! yes thats right Wigan this season to bolster there pack for the run in !!!!!!!!!!!!.

Maybe its because they've got a forward thinking coach who 'knows his onions' when it comes to the NRL and knows the player and what he can/could bring to his team given the chance.

Lets face it his last 2 games for us were full of promise and then our master technician decides he's then surplus to requirements.

In those 2 games Cross was bringing more with his performances than Hauraki had shown at that stage.

Hauraki gets given another chance and these last 3 games or so he's done very well IMO.

I wonder why Cross never got his second chance and how peoples opinions of him might have been different now had he got his second chance and built from the promise of his last 2 performances.

I still think given luck with injuries and a fair chance that Cross could prove to be a useful super league prop

Whats the betting he will be one of the better performers for the pies if he goes there, always a fan of cross but did not get much time to settle in or get a good run in team IMO

Some coaches can get players to exceed themselves some coaches turn good players to crud.

Giving them a run would surely be a start?

Cross going to another SL side and performing well would be pretty damning as far as BMD is concerned in my opinion.

I think you need a well respected coach at a big club like Leeds with the experienced and successful players it has - BMD did not really arrive with anything to suggest he is a respected coach.

From his quotes and interviews, I sometimes wonder if he's watching the same sport as me and it certainly doesn't instill confidence.

It wasn't really sarcasm aimed at you, more at the general situation with regard to mid-season signings. No offence was intended good sir.

You need to look at those two sentences in isolation.

BMD did arrive at Leeds as a respected coach to the majority of the players. He was regarded as vitally important to the success we achieved under Smith and was well liked by the players. So in that respect he arrived with respect. But to the players who had been there previously.

Your second sentence at the same time holds a lot of validity. Things change, and people change.