More likely hoovering machine

Apparently he's staying with Delaney and Mooreand they are making him do chores

although he still does as he likes

Explains why he didn't play tonight. Too embarrassed having been caught doing a womans job.

He valets when he wants.

If it was a Henry, I'd offer him the benefit of the doubt.

But a Hetty?



Got to be a shoe in for selection against Wigan.

Eat what he wants? www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/n ... -1-5499674

Eat what he wants? www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/n ... -1-5499674

6ft 6?!!! Who the hell measured him?

Quote ="thebloodbath"Eat what he wants? www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/n ... -1-5499674'" I would like to see anyone else eat a plateful like that.I would feed me for a week

Quote ="thebloodbath"Eat what he wants? www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/n ... -1-5499674'" I would like to see anyone else eat a plateful like that.I would feed me for a week

Starting at loose forward tonight

Anyone think TMFMISL has put on a few pounds?

I thought he did well tonight given he's back after a lay off.

He was on fire last night, wound up plenty of the pies as well

Was he wearing some Sinfield-esque biceps pads last night?

Tackled everything in front of him, and pulled out a great dive/ankle tap tackle in the 2nd half out wide. With him marshalling the middle we are a much stronger, organised, unit.

Oh dear, I despair at some posters.

Nick Scrutons attempt to put a king hit on TMFMISL went well didn't it. Don't know why Bentham felt the need to speak to TMFMISL about the aftermath and not the three Bulls players trying and failing to put him down. Bailey rose above Benthams bias by graciously finding him for a sporting handshake at the end to the obvious disappointment of Clarke who thought TMFMISL had other intentions

That really was well thought out by TMFMISL

It has been a long time since I've posted anything but tonights incident provided the right motivation.

It was a shoulder charge, but IMO it wasnt worth a red when you take into account it was only slightly late(certainly no later than the one on burrow)and there was little to no contact with the head. In fact I do not believe Thaler was going to take any notice until it resulted in a scuffle

No doubt TMFMISL's reputation, the penalty count and the bad high tackle went against him

That been said I think it will be sending off sufficient and Bailey will be back to help the boys to back up this great performance next week.

The RFL, rightly or wrongly, will back the ref on this one I reckon. Bit needless by Bailey TBH, hitting a defenceless player after the ball had gone. I'd hope they'd look at Mounis' head slam on Sinfield too, mind. Of the two incidents that, by far and away, was the riskiest in terms of potential to cause injury.

Late? Yes.

High? No.

[/u

This should be what he's known as from now HADPATBHG

Catchy! Guaranteed to catch on I'd say.

Even if he doesn't get a ban for the sending off, he'll get one (and rightly so) for the swinging arm in the first half. Very similar to the one McGuire got a ban for last year.

I'd like to think both Taia and Mounis will be taking a trip to the disciplinary this week, but I somehow doubt they will.

Ha ha. I didn't think it was as bad as his swinging arm shot earlier to be honest. The touch judge told the ref it was a head shot and Bonnie's husband sent him off. It was probably a culmination of his fouls that made him see red. Not sure if he will get further sanctions from the RFL. What's your thoughts?

I think the earlier swinging arm influenced the Red and out of the 2 i'd have expected a Red for the 1st rather than the hit on Bosc.
Overall we did ourselves no favours with stupid cheap penalties and when the tough calls had to be made i wasn't surprised they went against us.
Good to see Thaler at it again though totally ignoring the the high shots ,ptb interference amongst many calls we didn't get.