Not really.

1)Peacock didn't play at it.
2) The last contact before he picked it up was off Wild.

Haven't yet seen the replay, but it made me scratch my head at the time. Accidental offside for mine.

I thought all the officials had poor games tonight.
But one good thing that Silverwood did was to penalise the Giants ( mason ) i think for moving off the mark.
It made up for the earlier error when he penalised McGuire (I think) for holding Wilde when he moved forward about a metre as McGuire was trying to get back to marker.
Saints are masters at doing this to win dodgy penalties.
No matter how bad the ref was he wasn't the one dropping the ball in our 20 metre zone.
As has been said mistakes do tend to even out over a season.

didnt complain about him last week.

NEXT!

What about Where Sinfield had a clear facial on the floor and the ball knocked from his grasp. Knock on given. then in the next set Hudders lost the ball and a penalty given to them? Works both ways.

What about the trip on McGuire when he would have been clean through?

The Diskin try was completely correct. Do you not know the rules? Huddersfield knocked the ball on and it bounced off a player, that player not playing at the ball. Therefore play on.

Can't agree with the Diskin try being right. I felt scrum Leeds was the only way that Mr Alibert could go. Whether played at or not by Peacock, Diskin is offside.

Thought the refereeing was very poor again in the game, but the playing field was generally level and bad decisions went both ways.

Then learn the rules.

Look at it another way. If it was in the middle of the park and Huddersfield had the ball. If Diskin went in and made the tackle, and the Huddersfield man coughed up possession and it hit a supporting player coming in to make the tackle not playing at it. Diskin picks up the ball and runs to the try line.

Do you seriously think any questions would be asked about that? The scenario is no different. The Huddersfield player knocked on and it hit a player not playing at it. Play on is the rule.

thought it was accidental offside myself,first offence,scrum to leeds

I think that's right if it hadn't touched Wild last. Ref seems to have ruled Peacock didn't play at it and it touched Wild's leg on the way through putting Diskin on-side in that case. If it doesn't hit Wild, then you're right. I'm not too sure of the state of off-side when a player doesn't play at the ball. Unlucky for Hudds, but looked correct call. Where have we seen those recently?

Accidental offside

Excuse my ignorance of the rules but is Diskin offside if he dosn't play at it?

It seems strange that in other cases where you dont play at the ball but it hits you the rules treat it as it it hadn't hit you, like when it goes over the touchline, but not for offside.

In response to the original post, the ref wasn't great tonight but Ive seen a lot, lot worse. It also hilarious that 2 threads are started about a fairly standard performance on the Leeds board by Saints fans. I dont think Ive seen much complaning from the Huddersfield fans.

i thought once it hit peacock and went forward it was accidental offside,but i stand to be corrected

me too, but Mr Alibert confused the hell out of me last week so last night was no different

It's because of Buderus' £5million contract, as well as Donald's new and improved £6million contract.

Referee bungs will become a thing of the past due to the overpaid holidaymakers.

I hate Gaz.

It is isn't it but we can all highlight penalties we didn't get in a game can't we???
Jog on!

stop bickering, Leeds won fair and square - we dropped too much ball.
The ref made some wrong calls but every ref in every game does - it didnt effect the result, Leeds were far better on the night - thats why their champions i guess !!

Well done sir.

Yup well done. Looking forward to our next meeting.

Ref was poor for both teams.

bwaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha..

I'm still trying to understand the point of this thread, can anyone help?

Think it was posted by a ten year old..