Don't think he is on England duty, didn't make the final squad

He isn't. He was in the train on squad but so was Stevie Ward and he was about to head to America with Cuthbertson before his late inclusion to replace Ferres.

Only via speculations in newspapers. Hudds have no room on the cap unless we can offload a player of our own.
No doubt mar will oblige you.

I forgot the

We need to resolve this fairly quickly as the initial draft of your 2017 salary cap has to be with the RFL scrutiny team by 1st Nov and be finally ratified by 1st Dec.
GH stated we have already planned 2017 without Hardaker so I'm assuming som of his wages have already been used on Segarro/Ferres update Cant see how the "live" salary cap team will allow this to happen so I think this week is our last chance of getting rid otherwise we'll have to just sack him for his misdimeanors.

You will have space though with the player that you will be giving to us in part ex

Just because GH says/intimates/allows the rumour that we are at full cap, do not assume that is the case. Forked tongue & all that. It is within his interests for all Rhinos fans to believe that we are spending full cap.

I imagine Huddersfield will be paying Hardaker less than they are currently paying Brough.

by all accounts Brough causes as many problems as Hardaker

wood and huby?

Huby to Leeds? Whilst Ferres is here?!

Brough is 34. Whilst still a good player (at times) - that ship should've sailed.

Dont get the hype with Huby , vastly overrated tub of lard . Good beard though .

Can't say I've heard any tales of him getting into scraps while peed up out on the town. brough has his faults but any problem he has arent potentially criminal.

I wouldn't be so sure. Some of his haircuts break the laws of decency.

Brierley to Leeds, eventually.

Doubt after it should have already happened.

Who cares about what they do OUTSIDE the club?!?! The reason Hardaker is likely going is because his behaviour was leading to poor performances and failure to show up for training. If he was scoring every week and making the try saving tackles of previous years then we would have kept him even if he was scrapping with his mates every night.

Problems with Danny Brough are WITHIN the club, mainly that he apparently causes a toxic atmosphere in the dressing room, I have not heard any reports that Zak was effecting the other players in a bad way, except the blatant lies of people who didn't like him in the first place

That first sentence says it all. Players REPRESENT the club they play for- Leeds were happy to have a homophobic physical assaulter representing them but for some reason decide to get rid just after getting a large contract extension




The irony in that last section though

They represent us on the pitch not off it, if he was playing well and the players were happy with him then he wouldn't be being sold.

Also there is a big difference between the rumours that Brough disrupted the Huddersfield dressing room (backed up by him loosing his captaincy), and people coming on here saying that Hardaker was shagging Ryan Halls missus, and that is just one example of the stuff people were saying when he first was put on the transfer list.

I don't know much about Hardaker, but he's a better tackler than Lomax.

True, but Lomax at least poses some kind of threat ball in hand.

Only because lomax has learned the thought processes to be able to pass.

Instead of Zak's "I'll do it all meself" method.

people went moaning about him last year. funny how some can forgive some players a terrible run of games but not others