Where?

If you cannot provide links to where people have said these things its best you just STFU.

Thanks in advance.

PS Shhhhh

PPS Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Have they had the equivalent of webb,burrow,diskin,senior,buderus and the like missing at times like we have??
Impossible to compare the 2.

I AM saying it.

When we beat Saints they might as well put the blue and amber ribbons on the cup.





[size=59Of course I am only saying it to get up the mose of oppo fans.[/size

Man we are a bit tetchy, why the need to be all abusive like? Here we go here's your proof silly boy: Now go shush yourself bell end.

leicester_rhino wrote: My thoughts exactly. Its not exactly win win, but if we win the game we'd have to throw the trophy away from there. If we lose, we will have a really well rested squad, while St Helens have their annual party in London, shortly before humiliation in Manchester

Trimalchio wrote:I was about to post something on the same lines.

Saint Simon wrote: is it though? the winner of this match will be massive favourites and if they don't win it will be a shock result

So two mildly arrogant posts from 10 pages.

Well done.

yes actually: Raynor, Tony, Crocker(effectively missing) King, Whiting, Washbrook & Byrne. 4 of these having not played ANY games. Apart from Webb & blunderbus the rest have played have they not? Would you not say that you have ground out wins rather than won with great rugby? So yes very similar IMO

I said a few (And there are 3 if you can count up to that many) and gave you proof of the arrogant comments as you asked.You've been owned pal now jog on

The third one's user name might suggest that he isn't a leeds fan though, if you pause and think hard about it.....

Out of interest, do you think the winner of Leeds v Saints will be favourites to win the competition? Will it still be arrogance if the bookies agree?

For crocker read world cup winner greg eastwood!!
So your comparing tony to webb??LMFAO!!!
Before sunday burrow had played 16 minutes.
Buderus played half a game.
Again very different scenario's in terms of quality missing and no i wouldn't say we've played great rugby but we have played winning rugby with plenty more to come!!

I can't wait till we lift that trophy. They might aswell start the engraving after Saints have been beat

Challenge cup chokers sunshine. We'll dust you just like we did three times last season on dry tracks. You best pray for the rain pal.

Are the Saints players scared of the rain?

What was the excuse for 33-6 then?

No but we don't perform to our entertainers tag. It simply means the other sides in SL including yourselves who simply aren't up to the skill levels of the S men have a chance of a surprise victory, against the odds as proved at OT in recent times.

Your last two games have been entertaining for me.

I've said this before and I'll say it again. St Helens are nothing but a team who are still jelous of Wigans past success in a cup that does'nt matter anymore. Leeds are the champion performers of the days.

Really?



TROPHIES IN LAST 3 SEASONS
TOTAL – SAINTS 8, LEEDS 3, WIGAN 0, BRADFORD 0

LAST 10 YEARS
TOTAL – SAINTS 17, LEEDS 7, WIGAN 3, BRADFORD 9

SINCE 1996
TOTAL – SAINTS 20, LEEDS 7, WIGAN 4, BRADFORD 10

Was it raining against Hull KR & Celtic?

How do you perform whens its a bit overcast or just muggy?

Not that I want to back Damo up, as he is clearly insane, and not that I want to dispute Saints' dominance over the SL era, if we take heed of Damo's use of the term "Champion" how would that alter the trophy count? Accounting for the 2006,2007,2008 seasons, I reckon:

SAINTS 2, LEEDS 3, BRADFORD 1

Bless a new year another bottom slapping in a grand final and still you scouse gimps come out with pearler's like this!!
WHO ARE THE BACK TO BACK CHAMPIONS????

Fact is you have one trophy in the cabinet out of the possible four hardly the dominant force of British RL are you?

Got a long way to go before your up to the levels of the S men.

12

And pre 1996

game on a sunday?

game on a sunday?