The thing is though the touch judge was stood next to him whilst he was having a "nibble" and did jack sh##.
Btw how good was the Storm defence??
Brutal at times and scrambled well a deserved win as long as any audit of the accounts don't reveal anything!!

A decent kicker (no shortage of them in SL) would have made it 22-4. The minor premiers annihilated, go NRL, what a tight competition.

Should be clear from the wound if it's a rabid doggie bite.

Judge for yourself:

[urlhttp://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/nrl-grand-final-bulldogs-v-storm/story-fndujljl-1226484701474[/url

Although I suspect that your comments are for the benefit of Mr Eve, if you seriously believe that any Super League side could have lived with the Storm for even the first twenty minutes, you are clearly taking some excellent stimulants and I would like to know the name of your dealer.

Forgot to mention that I'm really disappointed with Graham, I always thought it was a bit of c*ck but, warmed to him towards the end of SH carreer and have been impressed with him this year. A disgusting act and worthy of a lengthy ban.

He has now been reinstated in Ronzy's faux scouse tw** hall of fame.

Can't believe he'll remain in NRL if found guilty. Perhaps those looking for a "mongrel" prop forward for Leeds might have found their man...

I don't think any super league side would have done any worse or better than the Doggies. Storm are a truly unique team, but the NRL isn't anywhere near as futuristic as Bill would like us to think.

Give over

Did you think Canterbury were going to win at any point in the second half? Storm were ruthlessly dominant.

given they were still trying to crack the storm defence until the last minute anything could have happened

a try in the last 10 minutes or so could have changed that whole game, to say they knew it was over was a silly comment to make

Is James Graham one of Dr Who's Cybermen ?

No personality and an aversion to all things gold ?

Are you a school teacher? Or just naturally condescending?

Canterbury never looked like scoring despite a number of repeat sets. Barba's kick for Morris the closest they came. Panic rugby set in, discipline waned and they were a beaten team well before the final whistle. The only team to get over the tryline in the second half was Melbourne, Norrie's try rightfully disallowed. As already mentioned If Smith had his kicking boots with him the game would have been over at half time.

Didn't look pretty from Graham and the strange thing was everyone was initially reacting to a Slater goal-line tackle where he appeared to go out of his way to try and avoid making dangerous contact with Perrett.

Stevo keeps telling us the NRL have done away with high shots, good to see there's still a place for cannibalism.

I don't know which would be worse, being bitten by that miserable ginger get or the hopoate finger

Or the Schoey finger.

No need to bring it down to that level

Bradley Clyde was quite shocked and perturbed by the incident.

Loiner4life could never understand what he was complaining about

Ear ear, its about time Graham was banned for a long long time now

That scuffle is the first NRL action I've seen all year. Not pretty from Graham and I would hope it's a pretty hefty ban. No need, not big, not clever.

For once I couldn't actually see anything wrong with Slater's actions in tackling the try scorer either. No knees, no elbows, not late.

I'm not excusing graham if is he proven to have bitten slater, horrible thing to do and has no place in any sport. However, aren't we jumping to conclusions a bit here? The pictures I've seen show that his head is near slater's ear but that's all. If he's going guilty ban him for a long time but let's wait and see what happens at the disciplinary first. A bite wound should be pretty obvious to the doctors.

He must have been peckish.

He is the FGB remember.

Yes.We have yet to hear anything in response from the JG camp about this,so i will be reserving judgement until all the facts are out and he is proven guilty.

If he does, then as you say its horrible and throw the book at him.

The thing i dont get is why? what had slater done to rile him up to do something that drastic? I always think of graham as a tough uncompromising player but cant say ive ever seen anything as underhand in his game as that.

I suppose the only person who can answer them is the man himself.

I think Slater told him he was no Ryan Bailey.

We've all seen Graham lose it (frothing at the mouth when replacing Fa'asavalu at Knowsley Road - and refusing to shake hands at Headingley) so why anyone would be shocked by this latest episode I'm not quite sure of.

Perhaps he's after a Union contract next?