With the exception of Rhyse Martin, I can barely think of a decent game or even more than a few good moments from all the 9 outgoing players combined.

Don’t think any of them changed the course of one single match.

Given I can think of a few games that Brad Dwyer changed , I think Blease has got it right.

The incoming players should be able to really influence and contribute at first team level. The squad looks quite thin but I’d rather have someone in who can give the opposition a headache rather than a bunch of selling platers. If injuries strike we could struggle but given we have finished 8th twice in a row I’d much rather the Blease approach and play the youngsters.

At least we have more chance of giving the top sides a proper game next year

[quote="Simmo71":3951o8ib]How can we take Macdonald or Stone? We don't have a quota space available. Or is there dispensation on quota spots as well as salary cap?[/quote:3951o8ib] Dispensation.

In that case there'll be plenty of interest in their overseas players. I'd definitely take Lafai. Wrong side of 30, but still quality. I like Shane Wright as well.

Didn’t we do something similar with Wellington Albert when Widnes got into difficulty. Anyone signed from Widnes was given exemption from cap and quota for the length of that intial contract.

Salford should have done the honourable thing end of last season and stepped down from SL and allowed London to keep their place. With the IMG grading system this makes should not have happened and makes the game look bad

It doesn`t look like we will be signing Watkins or any other Salford player unless we are well under the cap. A meeting of owners on Tuesday, saw the dispensation proposals thrown out - despite Salford being among the clubs to vote in favour of them being put in place. Many clubs believe allowing clubs to spend beyond the salary cap restrictions in place would damage competition integrity.