Quote ="Phuzzy"Be fair! It isn't even close to balanced. Hall 'expertly' picks the ball up but Leeds 'let' Green throw a dummy. Moon has a 'moment of brilliance' but Gelling 'stumbles over the line' (btw, had that been Hall, the report would have been all about 'great handling and how good he was in the air). The video referee 'had given the game to the Warriors' when all they did, in fact, was get the decision right! Micky Mac 'almost decapitated' JP (it was a run of the mill high shot and JP didn't even go to ground!) and apparently Dudson's 'only intent was to cause injury' (really? I mean...really?). That's before we get on to the use of terminology like 'thuggery' etc.
This is supposed to be a match report (albeit it on a Leeds forum) not the rantings of some sulky juvenile. Fair enough if yourself and others are happy for this to be the face of the Leeds forum. I know the vast majority of Leeds fans have far more class than this purile garbage.'"
Given that circumstances leading up to Mc Ilorum's tackle to describe it as a run of the mill high shot you are viewing the incident from your Wigan bias and could open you up to the same criticisim that you have targeted at the author of the article! Mc Ilorum had to lift himself off the ground to make the high shot therefore it is a pre meditated action. Also, why is it a pre requisite that a player hits the ground before it is deemed a dangerous tackle?
Do you regard the following as biaised?
"Wigan replacement Dom Crosby was also placed on report for an ugly tackle "
Sky Sports
As for "The face" of our board, I would point out that your board has garnered a reputation as one which does not welcome dialogue and constructive criticism from opposition fans and is quick to lock topics or ban posters should they be deemed as offending the Wigan faithful.
Finaly on class, I would ask you to answer the following question. Does coming on to a opposition board insulting their moderators and fans exhibit any on your behalf?
