Dear Mr. Flat Stanley,

You have never replied to any of my previous questions.

I would like to ask, what are you seeking to achieve with your postings?

Many thanks,

Sandro IL Terrorista.

He wants to show that one largely insignificant man in the 21st century can prove the Earth is flat with evidence from YouTube videos. Forget the space agencies, forget science, forget logic, forget mathematics, forget years of hard work, YouTube is where the truth can really be found.

Quote ="Ferocious Aardvark" See, most everyone knows that there is a permanent base at the South Pole, and many people do go there, there is as much evidence as any reasonable person would '" An interesting article on the BBC news website this morning regards the British scientific base on Antarctica www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35717932

Quote ="Ferocious Aardvark" See, most everyone knows that there is a permanent base at the South Pole, and many people do go there, there is as much evidence as any reasonable person would '" An interesting article on the BBC news website this morning regards the British scientific base on Antarctica www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35717932

Rubbish, and you know it. All we ever do is ask you to consider questions, and all you ever di is fail to answer.

Your current kneejerk of instead wailing on with copious cut'n'pastes to show how put-upon you are is just your latest smokescreen, to avoid having to consider let alone answer questions which you refuse to think about.

But, I am a petient enough sort of chap, and so let me repeat the question you've been swerving for weeks:

If the Earth is flat, why does the moon look upside down from Australia?

At this stage, I now know that you have no answer for this. You still have to stick to your group delusion that the Earth is not a globe, though, and so you do, even though this simple question cannot be answered if the Earth really was flat.

What you did do was (surprise surprise) link to yet another piece of YT drivel. On this occasion I did you the courtesy of watching it although I was not surprised to see that it was by a person who is either pretty stupid, so doesn't understand the question, or else is a deliberate attempt to provide those with weak brains and limited analytical faculties with fake "ammunition".

Let me tell the audience what your video link shows. It shows a flat plate with a picture hanging from a ceiling. It then demonstrates that if you go to one end of the room and look back at the picture, the top of the person's head is, from your perspective, to your left.

And if you go to the other end of the room, the top of the person's head is, from your perspective, to your right.

And this, the author risibly claims to think, is "the answer"!



The flat plate is a cylinder. The image is on the bottom of the cylinder. The effect you would need is to be able to see the TOP of the flat plate, i.e. invert the plate so the image is on the TOP side and we could see the BOTTOM side.

This obviously does not happen.

If a giant were to take a massive replica of that plate to the Moon, and affix it to what we perceive as the "bottom" of the Moon, then people in Australia would see this replica plate as being, from their perspective, at the "top" of the moon.

That is the effect you need to be able to explain, Stan. And I know it drives you mad that you can't. So there you go. You are on your own. Your link is exposed for arrant and childish half-baked nonsense.

Do you agree, or have you got a different explanation now that I've exposed the previous bunkum?

On the subject of moons.

Surely in Stan's world, every moon would be a full moon as there'd be nothing to block out the sun's light? Unless the sun was underneath the disk, but how could it be, because there's always a part of the Earth in sunlight.

Think about the crescents - what's causing that shadow? And if it isn't the Earth, then what is it?

Also, on daylight.

Each hemisphere has longer days in it's Summer. So if we take the Northern Hemisphere as being the 'middle' of Stan's disk world, and the Southern being the outer bit, then over the course of a year, the orbit of the sun within the Earth's firmament will move outwards and inwards?

Surely the Southern Hemisphere Summer, Australians would see the sun effectively shooting across the sky at a ridiculous speed as to get round the whole circumference of the disk in a day?

[iGee Whiz, I'm in demand. Vexing posts about me when i'm here, and when i'm not here.... Obsessed or what.If i was to respond to all the obsessive posts it'd take me ages. I''ll try to reply in due course, all posts which contain a flex and vex ad hominem nature will be ignored from now on. due to me being in such high demand.

[/i
[i

Quote Sandro IL Terrorist Wrote: Dear Mr. Flat Stanley,

You have never replied to any of my previous questions.

I would like to ask, what are you seeking to achieve with your postings?

Many thanks,

Sandro IL Terrorista.'"

[/i
[iI'm not trying to achieve anything honestly. Most conversations i have especially on this thread are instigated by two obvious obsessed tag teaming ambushers who vex their cranial insults in most sentences. How can you debate with such childlike behaviour, Yeah sometimes i bite back in retaliation but i'm never vitriolic and use brain insulting comments. I may have a varied outlook on life but does it deserve or warrant this Ad Hom abuse. No it certainly doesn't.So from now all posts asking for my views which contain, Ad Hom, vitriol, and taking the piece, will be ignored. Simples. So the answer to your question i want to achieve in not conversing with obsessed persona insulting reprobates.[/i

So you can't explain why the Moon looks upside down from Australia, then.

[i

Quote ="King Street Cat"He wants to show that one largely insignificant man in the 21st century can prove the Earth is flat with evidence from YouTube videos. Forget the space agencies, forget science, forget logic, forget mathematics, forget years of hard work, YouTube is where the truth can really be found.'"

[/i
[iI'm not trying to prove the Earth is flat, it is flat. I'm proving that we don't live on a spinning ball. Try trusting your perceptions. I can instantly remember you showing me your Concorde pictures with a beautiful flat straight horizon from 50.000 feet. Curvature doesn't exist and this is what your perceptions tell you. Start trusting your God given senses. A spade is a spade. Forget, science, maths, logic. and hard work, blinking heck. Okay then show me the Maths, Science, logic and hard work that disproves a Geocentric Earth in your own words please.....As you highly proclaim.... Good luck...I'm awaiting....Tick Tock....
[/i

Oh come on. We've been here FFS.

It's to guide the upside down planes at night, just before they flip over and land.

Did anyone else have to Google "Ad Hominem" ?

[i Quote ="Dreamer"An interesting article on the BBC news website this morning regards the British scientific base on Antarctica www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35717932'" Hahahaha. The BBC, its on the News it must be true. Gee Whiz. Have you actually seen where ALL the specialised tourist stations are. They're ALL coastal, Antarctica isn't an Island period, and its a heavily guided tour and very restrictive as to what you can do. You haven't got the freedom to just go anywhere Nilly Willy. Heres my take on Antarctica and its locations which are all coastal which is dodgy.and so is the "Globe Theory's South Pole.. Why can you never go to the true "Global"geographical south Pole? Simple because there isn't one. They've made one up. Hahahaha, with a glass sphere. If there's a "south Pole".Why do ALL compasses point to the North Pole above and below the equator. Because there is NO South Pole [/i [i [size=150As Captain Cooks sailed a 60.000 mile voyage around Antarctica, this model proves how he circumnavigated it. He simply circumnavigated 60.000 miles which ties in perfect with the internal ice wall. Antarctica isn't an island period.[/i[/size

[i Quote ="Dreamer"An interesting article on the BBC news website this morning regards the British scientific base on Antarctica www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35717932'" Hahahaha. The BBC, its on the News it must be true. Gee Whiz. Have you actually seen where ALL the specialised tourist stations are. They're ALL coastal, Antarctica isn't an Island period, and its a heavily guided tour and very restrictive as to what you can do. You haven't got the freedom to just go anywhere Nilly Willy. Heres my take on Antarctica and its locations which are all coastal which is dodgy.and so is the "Globe Theory's South Pole.. Why can you never go to the true "Global"geographical south Pole? Simple because there isn't one. They've made one up. Hahahaha, with a glass sphere. If there's a "south Pole".Why do ALL compasses point to the North Pole above and below the equator. Because there is NO South Pole [/i [i [size=150As Captain Cooks sailed a 60.000 mile voyage around Antarctica, this model proves how he circumnavigated it. He simply circumnavigated 60.000 miles which ties in perfect with the internal ice wall. Antarctica isn't an island period.[/i[/size

Remember folks, that an actual Adult just posted that.

Genuine question Stan... why would a compass point towards the North Pole if the Earth is flat? How does a compass work at all on a Flat Earth? Does it just point towards the centre?

Unbelievable.

Still hasn't answered the moon and daylight hours questions. What's with those crescent moons Stan? How are they created?

Given that one popular scientific hypothesis in the field of cosmology suggests that we are all three-dimensional projections of a two-dimensional 'flat' plane there really doesn't seem a great deal of the word 'fantastic' left to claim...

Quote ="FLAT STANLEY"[iHahahaha. The BBC, its on the News it must be true. Gee Whiz. Have you actually seen where ALL the specialised tourist stations are. They're ALL coastal, Antarctica isn't an Island period, and its a heavily guided tour and very restrictive as to what you can do. You haven't got the freedom to just go anywhere Nilly Willy. Heres my take on Antarctica and its locations which are all coastal which is dodgy.and so is the "Globe Theory's South Pole.. Why can you never go to the true "Global"geographical south Pole? Simple because there isn't one. They've made one up. Hahahaha, with a glass sphere. If there's a "south Pole".Why do ALL compasses point to the North Pole above and below the equator. Because there is NO South Pole [/i [i [size=150As Captain Cooks sailed a 60.000 mile voyage around Antarctica, this model proves how he circumnavigated it. He simply circumnavigated 60.000 miles which ties in perfect with the internal ice wall. Antarctica isn't an island period.[/i[/size'" I'm not sure why you post everything in bold (Internet shouting). Do you think shouting expresses your PoV more effectively or are you just insecure? Whilst I am quite happy to challenge the press, why would the BBC want to lie about such a thing? Why would the British Antarctic Survey lie? https://www.bas.ac.uk Your map has no basis in truth whatsoever and there is no demonstrable proof that you can provide to show it has.

Quote ="FLAT STANLEY"[iHahahaha. The BBC, its on the News it must be true. Gee Whiz. Have you actually seen where ALL the specialised tourist stations are. They're ALL coastal, Antarctica isn't an Island period, and its a heavily guided tour and very restrictive as to what you can do. You haven't got the freedom to just go anywhere Nilly Willy. Heres my take on Antarctica and its locations which are all coastal which is dodgy.and so is the "Globe Theory's South Pole.. Why can you never go to the true "Global"geographical south Pole? Simple because there isn't one. They've made one up. Hahahaha, with a glass sphere. If there's a "south Pole".Why do ALL compasses point to the North Pole above and below the equator. Because there is NO South Pole [/i [i [size=150As Captain Cooks sailed a 60.000 mile voyage around Antarctica, this model proves how he circumnavigated it. He simply circumnavigated 60.000 miles which ties in perfect with the internal ice wall. Antarctica isn't an island period.[/i[/size'" I'm not sure why you post everything in bold (Internet shouting). Do you think shouting expresses your PoV more effectively or are you just insecure? Whilst I am quite happy to challenge the press, why would the BBC want to lie about such a thing? Why would the British Antarctic Survey lie? https://www.bas.ac.uk Your map has no basis in truth whatsoever and there is no demonstrable proof that you can provide to show it has.

[i

Quote ="bandgeekmafia78"Genuine question Stan... why would a compass point towards the North Pole if the Earth is flat? How does a compass work at all on a Flat Earth? Does it just point towards the centre?'"

The North Pole is Centre of the Pond/Plain. The equator and both tropics still exist on the model. So no matter where you live whether it be Australia, Britain, China, or Timbuktu the compass needle always points to the Central North Pole Surely if we lived on a Ball with two poles, the needle would point to the hemispheric Pole you were nearest too.[/i.

You can't give an answer based on something with no evidence. A pond/Plain can't be proven because it doesn't exist. Plus magnetic fields are dipolar in nature, meaning they require a 'north' and 'south'.

Besides, if all this is known and factually testable why isn't it accepted by literally everyone else?

What's more likely, that the idea is dog sick or the whole scientific community, countries and planet are all covering it all up because they're trying to hide god. (You'd think an omnipotent creator could just say hello to bring the whole charade down, but I guess it's busy worrying about what gay fellas do with their dicks.)

It's pretty incredible that an adult can believe such make believe.

I could recount endless scientific evidence but you won't listen to any of it. So here's a simple one for you. Have you ever noticed that during the day it's light and during the night it's dark? And if it's light this side of the earth it's dark on the other? That's because the earth rotates on its axis, call it spinning if you want. If the earth was flat there would be no alternating night or day and it would be impossible to have day this side of the earth and night on the other side. If the earth is as you say flat, how come we have day and night? How come it can be dark one side and light the other? Do the Freemasons have so much power that they can turn the sun on and off?

It's getting like a Bedlam Freak Show! Where's my popcorn?

You mean there's more of them? S-WEET!

Another copy and paste job. Well done Stan

ctrl+C, ctrl+V, easy

The Moon reflects sunlight. If it was a light source
a) it wouldn't have phases and
b) it wouldn't go dark when eclipsed.


"Laughable"? Why would a simple fact (or if you like, a claim of a certain distance) be "laughable?


Why do you constantly lie, Stan? The Moon sometimes appears larger than the Sun, and sometimes smaller. This is because it doesn't have a perfectly circular orbit. You must have hear of the so-called "Super-moon"? Did you look up and see it for yourself? You must have hear of annular eclipses. Or are they just more "CGI"?


Astronomers as the centuries pass in improving their measurements shock


Nope. The Sun gives off a wide range of light, the vast majority being outside the visible light spectrum.


No, "moonlight" is just reflected sunlight.


Utter bilge. When you go to the rugby, Stan, are those convex rugby balls invisible, then? What about people's heads? Can't you see them either?




This is a sentence that actually has no meaning.


Er, nope, everyone on the planet knows it does no such thing. Including you.


That would be because there is no such thing, when the side of the Moon facing Earth isn't illuminated by the Sun, the far side IS illuminated by the Sun. Secondly, there are any number of images of the far side of the Moon, taken by numerous spacecraft. The sad fact is that there could be a billion, you would never accept a single one as real.

Now, Stan - WHY DOES THE MOON LOOK UPSIDE DOWN WHEN VIEWED FROM AUSTRALIA?