Probably still thinking about an answer to the 'what did conspiracy theorists do before the internet?' question which still remains unanswered by our resident search, copy and paste expert.

They bored their mates down the pub and probably still do.
I say mates ... I bet many a pint has been supped up swiftly as they entered the door.

Has peace and harmony descended upon this thread.
Or is there a conspiracy convention somewhere that has diverted our chief protagonists?

The above comment is obviously wrong. I've not posted recently and the conversation has took one hell of a nosedive. So fill your boots sheeple you're welcome to spew your hypnotised drivel.



Until the next false flag event, which i'm in no doubt won't be long. Adios

Good riddance you lunatic

Wasn't that yesterday, with the false Russian flag NASA spoof of "Major" Tim Peake, laughably purporting to blast into Space and board the mythical "Space Station"? I mean, Baikonur, right? It was so obvious that was just an old Thunderbirds set, wasn't it? I can't work out though why the real Russians haven't spilled the beans.

There's a certain amount of irony here in that you are also a member of the sheeple following the hypnotised drivel of folk with dubious credibility on those nut job conspiracy news sites you frequently copy and paste from.

i've no idea what you've posted but i'd give a very good guess it'll be something like some Freemason with a name similar to TWIN PEAKES faking a launch in a pretty big firework which curved into[url=https://youtu.be/3U9Z_uH1iCo?t=11A HORIZONTAL POSITION WITHIN 40 SECONDS[/url ha ha i found it most amusing all the sheeple we're all cheering and clapping a Hollywood film. I wonder why it only shown 2 minutes of footage with supposedly with tens of thousands of satellites roaming the earth. It could of filmed the full flight, It's a wonder itself that it managed to swerve all satellite obstructions up there too. I also found it hilarious how the fake module travelling at 17.000mph at 5mps without crashing ha ha manages to [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Si8nSU-gd-ADOCK[/urlwithout a single hitch whilst sub-mergerd within the pure vacuum of space whilst at the same time the control room guys were all munching on their sandwiches ha ha i found it hilarious. The film was [url=https://youtu.be/_lRApcwdpWM?t=144FULL OF AGAIN CGI[/url The only proof in that film that they entered orbit was the pesky pendulum started bouncing ha ha [url=https://youtu.be/_lRApcwdpWM?t=432I find it so hilarious how the sheeple are easily fooled. Ha ha[/url

Your avatar is very appropriate .. you don't know what he wrote, but you'd guess blah di blah ... bingo!
Give over ...

Without a single hitch? You're having a laugh!
The automatic docking system went awry and they had to dock manually ... you know like they had been trained to.
Besides you watched a bit, why did you bother when you think it's all a fake?
Having doubts are we?
Starting to reason are we?

You're an hypnotist's dream.

Hypnotist dream Ha ha i don't watch Mainstream hypnosis channels you do



I watch/ listen to alternative media. Much more meat on the bones and a lot closer to the truth



Anyway the threads all yours i've had enough of this flatulence subject.

Goodbye Flatulence Stanley.

If I started walking East. At what point would I fall off the flat earth? China?

Regards

King James

What a complete and utter knob you are.

https://twitter.com/ProfBrianCox/status ... 8893267969

https://twitter.com/ProfBrianCox/status ... 8893267969

Please Sir! I know his answer to that one Sir!

You can't! You would be prevented by the Great Ice Wall which is at The Edge!

if you were thinking, how do they get to and from the permanently crewed station at the South Pole, and the many other places in Antarctica - they don't! If it doesn't fit with Great Ice Wall, then it is fake. Simples!


All fake? None of these countries actually have any such stations.

Sightseeing flights over and now to Antarctica- fake! Flights from S.America to Australia - fake! (They never ever fly, apparently, and even though you can book one like now, apparently you couldn't actually book if you actually tried. All the hundreds of thousands who claim to have flown these routes over the last few decades - liars plants or delusionals, all of them.

That's our Stan. Ask Stan - Stan knows. And, I got his take on the fake Tim Peake's fake flight to the fake ISS right in spades, didn't I?

You're wrong. The Great Ice Wall is permanently manned by blokes dressed in black, probably NASA agents, stopping people from falling off the edge of the world. Tyrion Lannister, the great explorer once went and had a look:

Back on topic [url=http://asheepnomore.net/2015/12/15/a-politician-tweeted-about-san-bernardino-terrorist-attack-on-nov-13th-before-it-happened/More Propaganda[/url

Well, again, I don't think they are, in all cases, mutually exclusive. It's a complex relationship which I could spend quite a number of pages talking about - if I had the time (hence the [ulate[/u reply to your question).



I'm not really sure why it DOESN'T matter to you.





You are right in saying I can't give you the exact names of the individual shooters in Dealey Plaza (do these even matter?). But you are wrong if you think I haven't told you who was responsible. I've repeatedly named the prime suspects who conspired to assassinate President Kennedy and provided a ton of supporting evidence.

Those names are (in no particular order):

Allen W. Dulles (former head of the CIA).
James Angleton (former head of CIA counter-intelligence division).
Guy Bannister (ex-FBI)
David W. Ferrie (CIA)
Clay Shaw (CIA/OSS)
General Curtis D. LeMay (head of Strategic Air Command)
Richard Bissell (CIA)
David Atlee Phillips (CIA)
H.L. Hunt (Big Oil)
General Edward Lansdale (CIA)
D.H. Bird (Big Oil)
Jack Ruby (CIA/mafia)
Richard Helms (CIA)
William K. Harvey (and his ZR-RIFLE company which almost certainly provided the shooters). (CIA)
McGeorge Bundy (Kennedy staff)
Bill Greer (Secret Service)
and others ...



As I've repeatedly said - I really don't see the tower question as crucial. Once you know there was significant insider trading in the days leading up to 9/11 on the very airlines involved the fate of the towers becomes a secondary issue. Had the US government possessed ANY evidence linking Bin Laden and his group to shorting the stocks of those airlines they would have published it in triple-oversized bold font. The fact that they chose instead to throw a veil of secrecy over the entire issue really doesn't leave one with a great deal of doubt as to the origins of the conspiracy.



I like the fact that you just PRESUME I automatically think everything is a conspiracy first and then (possibly) adjust my opinions in accordance with evidence. This is despite the fact that I have repeatedly told you that the only conspiracy I consistently took seriously in thirty five years was JFK...

I don't need you or anyone else to validate my opinions. I'm confident in what I know and if you want to believe something different that's your business.



Quite.

Another reasonable post ... we are on a convergent path.

Gee Whizz you're well versed with the JFK facts, although theres many key players in his death are you aware of the shooter who delivered the brutal head shot ?. Theres many theories but i was under the impression William Greer delivered it. There was also the theory Jackie Kennedy or the roadside sewage shooter pulled the fatal head shot. All i've researched on this event is the massive ritualistic side to it.

Translation: I have no comeback for that hole in the flat earth theory. You do realise, dont you, that anything as big as the earth is impossible to be flat as it would just collpase due to that thing called gravity? Or are you saying that every single scientist who has studied gravity and the earth is on the illuminati's payroll? All hundreds of thousands of them?

Regards

King James

Indoctrination.

Seriously? Are you for real? The whole process of science is to question what people have put before and not to just accept it as the norm. Thats why, you know, any research is put out there to be critiqued by their peers. I give up.

regards

King James

For such an independent news site they're more than happy to roll with the advertising click bait. The whole page is littered with it.

Greer shooting Kennedy really doesn't square with eye-witness testimony. I think it is a smokescreen and not worthy of merit. The same goes for Jackie - although I do think she was mixed up with a bunch of very strange people.