The Google branding on that plane is a terrible Photoshop job.

Proper funny.

Trust me I know about these things ....
The Google decals are only there to hide the NASA logos ..... barstards!

Surely they'd be Freemason symbols?

But I keep giving you the means to actually see and experience hundreds of satellites passing over your head, and yet you constantly ignore the fact that you =#FF0000CAN see them =#FF0000WITH YOUR OWN EYES on any clear night - if you choose to do so.

I have asked you many times to explain how this can be so, if the satellites did not exist, and you always completely ignore this rather large elephant in your room. Are you afraid to contemplate the answer? Occam wouldn't be.

But as I'm a helpful kind of guy, here are just some of the ones visible in the general Leeds night sky this early evening. Any time you want to explain how come you can see them, if they don't exist, please, do feel free!

[iHere is a typical mast. With regards to Sky TV being analogue transmitted here is the proof that nails FA's diarrhea.[/i

[iAs you can see Analogue signals are not obsolete. Your freeview box or Sky box transforms the analogue signal to Digital. Now i'm not saying Sky and Freeview carry the same analogue band. They both receive different frequency bands. Here is another piece of evidence Satellite signals are [/i[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analogue_television_in_the_United_KingdomAnalogue[/url.
[i[uSatellites don't exist. Now you show me true authentic photo evidence of your satellite.[/uI await more CGI Ad Hominem verbal Diarrhea.[/i

So, Stan, what are these then?_

??

Is that it. :

Thats not photographic. Thats just a friggin list. How pathetically embarrassing

[i[uSign of a loser rearranging my posts.[/u[/i[i Satellites are now in the coffin [/i

Your poor response is what is "pathetically embarrassing". You continue to make an utter fool of yourself.

You claim to want to see satellites for yourself, if they exist.

There is NO image ANYONE could EVER provide to you, which you would EVER accept, unless it fitted your bizarre beliefs. But the direct evidence of your own eyes would, if you are sane, and not a troll, be all you needed.

So, you could see loads of satellites, if you only wanted to. I have merely provided you with the tools. But I already knew you dare not use them, for fear of having to swallow your pride and admit your error to yourself.
Everyone knew you would bluster and swerve the issue. You really are a laughing stock.

That's your problem, but there's the list, you need only look up into the sky. Couldn't make it any easier for you.

[iI've just proven how Sky TV works with authentic evidence. How can i be the fool. If you disagree please provide me a authentic Satellite in working order.. like i did. Goodluck.[/i..

No you didn't.

I doubt you have ever actually proved anything of a scientific nature in your life.
You might have proved bread ....

I think he's right. I'm looking out of my window now and I can't see a satellite.

Proof.

Suck it b|tches.

hahaha bet you can't

In your head. Utter nonsense, which you (or anyone with a working satellite dish) can debunk in an instant by obstructing the line of sight to the satellites, while leaving all the rest of the dish's view including the whole of the visible planet, unobstructed.

Quote ="FLAT STANLEY"How can i be the fool.'"

How can you be the fool? Let me count the ways ...





1. I can't provide you with a satellite as they tend to be a tad on the expensive side for my wallet.

2. If in your head you are convinced you provided me "a authentic Satellite in working order", where did you get it from, given you say they don't exist?

Isn't it odd how all the TV aerials in my area point towards Emley Moor transmitter and yet all the Satelite dishes point at near right angles to them in what could only be described as a direction of 28.2 degrees East. Exactly where the SKY Satellite is supposed to be. Clever these NWO people aren't they, hiding an invisible TV Transmitter on the hills between here and Sheffield.

Not even NASA can provide an authentic Working Satellite, i always knew you couldn't.

As your good luck would have it, one of the working satellites, and not even a NASA one, the International Space Station, will be passing overhead in full view all the next week. Any ISS prediction program or app will forewarn you of the precise times and path at your location, and all you need is a reasonably clear sky.

The brightest imminent pass will be next Wednesday, but you can see it every evening, even tonight low in the South for a short distance.

Here is a chart showing what you'll see, (next Wednesday) with rise, peak and disappearance times. The main stars are clearly mapped and I've pointed a red arrow at the spot where the ISS will cross into the Earth's shadow and rapidly fade out of view.



Enjoy! And then try to make up some ludicrous alternative explanation.

[iThat doesn't prove anything. Like i said they're separate to the Tv feed. Also built up areas wouldn't use the same masts for obvious reasons Most Terrestrial Aeries point towards Winter Hill in the Manchester area. Just incase you haven't noticed there are Communication Masts Everywhere. Where i live the Sky dishes point towards a known mast in the Trafford Park area. The EMF count is off the scale where its located. I should know i carried out Fire Risk Assessments there.Obviously i can't account for everyones TV feed but just to prove the terrestrial TV signal is still analogue fed, when the digital switchover happened nobody had to switch aerials. The Digibox or your in built in Freeview TV transforms the analogue to Digital exactly the same with Sky. Simples[/i.

[iHahaha Whats That wheres the authentic working Satellite picture that's PACMAN. Its a CGI illustration[/i.


[iHow can anybody take you serious. I didn't ask for illustrations. Mugwumps right your photo analysis is shocking.[/i

What are you even going on about Stan?

You can't be this stupid surely?

You go on and play toy soldiers Mr infantry man. You know nothing.

Quite the ego you have there, Stan.

I'd suggest brushing-up on your reading comprehension, critical thinking skills, and reality before commenting on others.

Have you recently received a blow to the head?

This is ace. Next Stanley will be telling us that its impossible to see these satellites with a pair of binoculars. Protip for you Stanley, buy a pair and try it yourself. Not a telescope, its more difficult with a telescope. Just some half decent binoculars. You may even see that glass roof, 100km above the earth

Regards

King James

You do realise that he thinks the ISS is a hologram?

If you're prepared to go to those kind of lengths to preserve your original lie, nothing will be off limits when it comes to explanations.