David Icke you must be joking. He is a proven Freemasonic Gatekeeper.

You're just stalking me now.

You added no substance to this thread whatsoever. I use emoticons to child like posters

So his progeny would think exactly the same?
That's an interesting twist to genetics.
Let's hope at the very least that their thought processes are logical and lead them to sensible conclusions basesd on real evidence and not what Professor Fink postulates in his latest book on some overarching world order.
Besides this NWO sounds infinitely more attractive than the caveman world we still inhabit.
Except I forgot ... that is when they insert a chip into our brains at birth and we become slaves.
Shiite we can't win!
Might as well end it all now and save ourselves.

Thats a great idea KID.



Another great informative contribution KID.

Well dodged again Mugwump.

I've added plenty substance, but in true Mugwump style you dodge anything that you can't answer or that questions your I'm always right self importance. Just as a starter for ten, lets see if you can answer the two below. Without dodging, or silly little emoticons I hasten to add.

1.) Your research finds you a quote, that in your words proves as FACT the existence of the New World Order. It doesn't take me very long to prove this quote is inaccurate and unreliable. This shows about how reliable your research is, maybe you should look elsewhere?

2.) You present evidence that Sandy Hook was a conspiracy. One of the main pieces of evidence you presented via your "Research" to prove this, is that a Planning for the needs of Children in disasters was run in the state on the same day "And this cant be a coincidence." However, when you properly look into it, not just directly take a quote from the Daily Crackpot, then you see that at least six of these events took place across the state over the Month and Month after the disaster. This would show it was actually a planned scheme and not a one of "Coincidence" . Yet more evidence that maybe you should be looking elsewhere.

STALKER ALERT.

1.David Rockefeller is a known evil, evil psychopath. This man swears his allegiance to the NWO Cabal in his memoirs book



2. Sandy Hoax is one hell of a fake. There's a million and one abnormal findings which needs a thread of its own to explain the lengths they went too with that operation.I dare you to open a thread on it. I'd bombard it with the truth.



You are a bad stalker

JLM32s [uOBSESSION [/uwith me is bordering on creepy. When he's not talking to me he's talking about me.

1.) Still no response to your fake quote. You desperately tried to pass of as fact. How sad an embarrassing for you.

2.) Yet you can't even explain the one comment ive made? Why would I open up another thread that you can fill with your tin hat wearing conspiracy theorist nonsense?

A stalker? No just replying to your rubbish.

Oh would you look at that Tweedledee posts and then as if by magic here's tweedleverydumb. Even using the same weird obsession/stalker angle as the homophobe. What a strange coincidence.

Just a couple of things. 1.) No matter how big you make a word or how many times you underline it, it doesn't make it anymore true.

2.) I'd have thought even someone as pompous and self important as you would see that I can't make a comparison to you, without mentioning you. Hardly rocket science is it?

Just as an addendum to the above - [url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-sachs/hilary-clinton-and-the-is_b_8627042.htmlElect Hilary[/url and get Bush's foreign policy free! (Huffington Post).

For heaven's sake! Change the record before you bore everyone rigid. In the two days I've been too busy to post you've not stopped yapping about me. That's [uOBSESSIVE STALKER [/ubehaviour. I mean, I've seen weirder. But it's still pretty weird.

Either way - it's clear that responding to you just makes it worse for everyone else in here so I think it's time to just turn you off.

No, I think you'll find I've been comparing you, and to do that you would have to be mentioned, not really that hard to understand is it? You have so many similarities it's harder not to compare you. I think you really need to check the definition of Obsessive Stalker, whoever you are posting as.

Turn me off, that just proves my point to everyone here, that you can't handle anyone who has a differing opinion or stands up to your attempted Bullying tactics.

If anyone is bored, read the David Icke forums. They are hilarious

Regards

King James

To be honest, I don't know a great deal about the guy - other than he attracts a ton of stick and used to host snooker on BBC2.

That said, I do know he was pushing for an investigation into the very same crowd of paedophiles at Dolphin Square at least [uten years[/u before anyone in authority made the effort. And he was banging the drum about Jimmy Savile for even longer.

Can't comment on any of his other claims but he was certainly correct on those counts.

Yeah David Icke exposed big names in his book Saville, Leon Britain, Lord Mountbatten, and Ted Heath just to name a few.

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
-Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

There is no way David Icke is anything but controlled opposition. He is an agent of propaganda hired to herd dissent and people with questions towards far fetched territories such as Shape-shifting reptilian Aliens. In other words he's drip feeding truth's to reel you in then gate keeps you only then leading you to the NWO agenda ( making you believe in aliens ).

I believe David Icke is a very intelligent man, researcher but most of all a very good communicator. I think he believes too much that is told to him but is more right than people give him credit for. I saw him being interviewed on "The Project Camelot" series of youtube interviews - mostly phony's of those I have seen. I had previously seen an American predecessor , Jordan Maxwell on the same series. Apparently JM had sponsored DI in some way. DI seemed to use similiar ways of speaking about things as JM. I observed that JM spoke about having the feeling of being protected by invisible forces. DI articulated the same thing. I believe he had this, perhaps subconsciously to his "repertoire". David Icke had based his style on American style "communicators " in the same way the Beatles copied US Rock N Roll and took it back

The Main Stream Media IS the censorship machine. Everything you will ever hear through the "official channels" about the government, any politician or public figure of any kind any business or business owner, any crime or criminal or anything of any significance whatsoever gets filtered through the Main Stream Media. If they don't want you to hear about it, you won't. If you ever utter a word that wasn't on TV or state an opinion that isn't officially sanctioned, you're immediately a fruitcake ( Proven in this thread ) When you think about it, it's very simple. You will not be legitimate unless the Main Stream makes you legitimate. And anyone who is legitimate is absolutely someone you probably shouldn't trust.

So why is Icke, Alex Jones etc Gate- Keepers ? Its to drag you into believing in Aliens.And that's the NWO agenda.

Virtually every time I talk to someone about anything of a 'conspiratorial' nature, they assume that I must believe in aliens.The gate-keeper conspiracy Researcher’s push this alien nonsense. Alarm Bells to anyone talking any Alien Bull. There’s no doubt David Icke talks a lot of sense with certain topics but his whole agenda is to drag you in with the truth then gate keep you to believing in Shape-shifting Reptilians Aliens really exist.

Over And Out.

Well, I do believe in aliens. There's nothing particularly special about the processes which led to the arrival of homo sapiens on planet earth and given the limitless possibilities afforded by a universe of unimaginable scale it's just silly to think they couldn't be repeated on myriad worlds. And that's without even getting into the possibility of sentient life forms developing on planets which an alarmingly high number of purportedly eminent scientists seem willing to rule out entirely because they are not "sufficiently earthlike" (how these people ever managed to pass "Research Methods 101" amazes me).

Does this mean they are already here among us? Leaving aside the thorny issue of whether life was delivered to a nascent earth millions of years ago from elsewhere (which kind of renders the question irrelevant anyhow) - all I'll say is that any space-faring race that has mastered the problem of interstellar travel isn't likely to accede to requests from the military to "keep a low profile" and only whizz about everyone's backs are turned (which is all eight or nine series of the X-Files in a nutshell!)

The US Air Force used UFOs as a convenient cover for a variety of top-secret operations during the 50s and 60s including surveillance balloons, nuclear early-warning systems, experimental aircraft etc. From thereon the phenomena took on a life of its own. IIRC, Bill Turner was one of many former military personnel who began to smell something fishy about the whole story. His conclusion (shared by many of his colleagues) was that the armed forces were engaged in a deliberate and systematized disinformation program whereby "Top Secret" documents containing UFO-related data were dispersed among middle-to-high ranking officials ostensibly by "mistake". These "leaks" served the dual purpose of uncovering those officers who couldn't keep their traps shut whilst also disseminating a ton of weird, wonderful and completely bogus UFO myths among the general public.

Who'd have thought that the subject Stand Offish started after the events that cost 130+ people their lives we'd be reading about David Icke and Aliens whilst barely touching on the victims and the response of the French and allies.

Cool stories bro, cool stories.

I'm touched by Sheldon's humanity.

[url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34956900It's patently obvious the word "might" doesn't enter into this.[/url. It's as good as a cast-iron guarantee.

We're moving into a completely different socio-political paradigm where Terror is the new Reality, folks. Whether you want to believe a bunch of fundamentalist, dope-peddling Arab Bond villains with Mad Hacker Skillz are responsible or our own governments - it really doesn't matter. The end result is the same. More war (on a significantly bigger scale). Greater internal security. Greater surveillance. Dramatically reduced civil liberties (indefinite detention, penetration and neutralization of protest groups), militarized police etc.

So I guess the question you have to ask is - [iare you feeling scared yet?[/i

If i was a law abiding muslim i'd be scared. The rise in Islamaphobia is deafening since the Paris episode. The powers that be know exactly what they're doing by dividiing society.

I feel sympathy for the Arabs (just as I have sympathy for all creeds, colours and religions which are chewed apart by our insatiable war machine). But ultimately they've got to look after themselves.

First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for the Communists and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.

1998 just called, it wants its memes back

Regards

King James