Imo the case for austerity was always pretty weak, but it is now almost definitely causing much more harm than good.

The problem is that politicians all around the developed world (nobody more so than Cameron and Osborne) have invested so much political capital into austerity, that there is no way for them to turn away from it without admitting they have made a string of absolutely shocking decisions, that have had disastrous consequences.

I have no idea why Labour aren't absolutely nailing the conservatives with this. All I can think is that they don't back themselves to be able to convince the public with facts and evidence, vs the Tories 'common sense' soundbites of: belt tightening, maxing credit cards etc.


The confidence fairy. If only the government wasn't spending so much money (risking turning us into the new Greece), then big business would have the confidence to spend and invest again, and that would lead to a private sector lead recovery like the one we're going through now... oh wait.

I do actually know (not by choice) someone who shares similar ideas with LeighGionaire.

They also believe that 9/11 was caused by the US government.

Well you could argue that, indirectly, it was...

*hides under tinfoil hat*

Yeeees. Indirectly, is the word.

That's not what they're meaning.

I have heard, more than once, the: 'steel doesn't melt at ...' argument. They get laughed at. To their face. And not just by me.

If I ever need a good laugh, I google "9/11 conspiracies"

[url=http://www.unison.org.uk/news/news_view.asp?did=8526Check this out[/url.

A school is found to have asbestos. Then the HSE changes its mind and says it's safe, even though other independent inspections say there is a problem. And the HSE won't release the report.

That would be one way to save money.